Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Automobile Manufacturers List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing Automobile Manufacturers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s largest automobile producer and exporter, accounting for over 30% of global vehicle output in 2025. The country’s automotive manufacturing ecosystem is highly diversified, with concentrated industrial clusters offering competitive advantages in cost, innovation, and supply chain integration. This report provides a strategic overview of key Chinese industrial hubs for sourcing automobile manufacturers, with a comparative analysis of regional performance in price competitiveness, quality standards, and lead time efficiency.
For procurement managers, understanding regional specialization is critical to optimizing sourcing decisions—balancing cost, compliance, and production agility.
Key Industrial Clusters for Automobile Manufacturing in China
China’s automotive manufacturing is concentrated in six core industrial clusters, each with distinct competitive advantages:
- Pearl River Delta (Guangdong Province)
- Hub Cities: Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan
- Focus: New Energy Vehicles (NEVs), electric drivetrains, smart mobility systems
-
Strengths: Strong R&D, integration with electronics supply chains, proximity to export ports
-
Yangtze River Delta (Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Shanghai)
- Hub Cities: Shanghai, Ningbo, Hangzhou, Suzhou
- Focus: Full-cycle OEM manufacturing, high-end ICE and NEVs, Tier 1 suppliers
-
Strengths: World-class infrastructure, dense supplier networks, foreign joint ventures
-
Changchun–Harbin Corridor (Northeast China)
- Hub Cities: Changchun (Jilin), Harbin (Heilongjiang)
- Focus: Traditional ICE vehicles, heavy-duty trucks, legacy OEMs (e.g., FAW Group)
-
Strengths: Historical manufacturing base, skilled labor in mechanical engineering
-
Chongqing–Chengdu Corridor (Southwest China)
- Hub Cities: Chongqing, Chengdu
- Focus: Mass-market sedans, SUVs, EV platforms
-
Strengths: Lower labor costs, inland logistics incentives, government-backed EV zones
-
Central Plains (Hubei, Henan)
- Hub Cities: Wuhan, Zhengzhou
- Focus: Mid-tier passenger vehicles, commercial vehicles, EV battery integration
-
Strengths: Central logistics access, emerging NEV clusters
-
Bohai Rim (Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei)
- Hub Cities: Beijing, Tianjin, Baoding
- Focus: Luxury and premium-brand joint ventures, autonomous driving tech
- Strengths: High R&D investment, proximity to policy centers, tech talent
Regional Comparison: Key Production Hubs for Sourcing
The table below compares the top two diversified and export-ready regions—Guangdong and Zhejiang—against core performance metrics critical to global procurement strategy.
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang |
|---|---|---|
| Average Unit Price (USD) | $18,500 – $22,000 (NEV Sedans) | $17,000 – $20,500 (NEV & ICE Models) |
| Pricing Notes | Premium for smart features & EV tech | Competitive due to supplier density |
| Quality Tier | High (Tier A/B OEMs, ISO 14001, IATF 16949) | High (Strong compliance, export-focused) |
| Quality Notes | High consistency; strong in electronics integration | Emphasis on process control; fewer defects |
| Lead Time (Standard Order) | 8–12 weeks | 6–10 weeks |
| Lead Time Notes | Slight delays due to port congestion | Efficient inland logistics; faster production cycles |
| Primary Sourcing Advantage | Innovation (EVs, connectivity, AI) | Cost efficiency and supply chain agility |
| Recommended For | High-tech EVs, smart mobility solutions | Cost-optimized volume procurement |
Note: Prices reflect FOB Guangzhou/Shanghai for mid-size NEVs (60 kWh battery, Level 2 autonomy). Lead times exclude shipping and customs clearance.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For Innovation-Driven Procurement (e.g., EVs, Smart Features)
- Target Region: Guangdong
-
Rationale: Access to BYD, GAC Aion, XPeng, and Huawei-backed ecosystems. Ideal for integrating ADAS, V2X, and battery-swapping technologies.
-
For Cost-Optimized Volume Orders
- Target Region: Zhejiang
-
Rationale: Dense supplier network reduces component costs. Geely, NIO, and numerous Tier 2 suppliers enable lean production.
-
For Compliance & Quality Assurance
-
Prioritize: Factories with IATF 16949 certification and export history to EU/NA. Shanghai and Ningbo lead in audit readiness.
-
Risk Mitigation
- Diversify Sourcing: Combine Zhejiang (cost) with Guangdong (innovation) to hedge against regional disruptions.
- Monitor Policy Shifts: National “Made in China 2025” and local NEV subsidies may shift production incentives post-2026.
Conclusion
China’s automobile manufacturing landscape is regionally specialized, offering procurement managers multiple strategic pathways. Guangdong excels in technological advancement and smart vehicle integration, while Zhejiang delivers superior cost-to-quality efficiency and faster turnaround. A dual-region sourcing strategy, supported by rigorous supplier vetting, positions global buyers to leverage China’s scale without compromising on quality or delivery.
For SourcifyChina clients, we recommend initiating supplier audits in Ningbo (Zhejiang) and Guangzhou (Guangdong) to benchmark performance and negotiate long-term MOQ agreements ahead of 2027 procurement cycles.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Q1 2026 Edition – Confidential for Client Use
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Automotive Component Procurement
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
This report clarifies critical sourcing requirements for automotive components (e.g., powertrain, chassis, electronics) – not OEM manufacturer listings. Misalignment on technical/compliance parameters drives 68% of auto supply chain disruptions (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). Key focus areas: material integrity, precision tolerances, and certification validity. Note: “Automobile manufacturers list” is a misnomer; procurement targets component specifications per OEM technical packages (e.g., GM GMW, Ford WSS).
I. Technical Specifications: Core Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements
| Component Category | Primary Materials | Critical Parameters | Testing Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine Blocks | ASTM A48 Class 30 Gray Iron, ADC12 Aluminum | Tensile Strength ≥ 207 MPa (Iron), Porosity ≤ 0.5% (Al) | ASTM E8, ISO 945-1 |
| Brake Rotors | GJL-250 Cast Iron, Carbon Steel | Hardness 180-220 HBW, Carbon Content 2.8-3.2% | SAE J431, ISO 6892-1 |
| EV Battery Housings | 6061-T6 Aluminum, CFRP | Thermal Conductivity ≥ 167 W/m·K, 0.1mm Delamination Max | ASTM D7028, ISO 22810 |
| Wiring Harnesses | PVC/CPE Insulation, OFHC Copper | Flame Resistance UL 94 V-0, Conductivity ≥ 100% IACS | UL 62, ISO 6722-1 |
B. Dimensional Tolerances
Per ASME Y14.5-2023 & OEM-Specific GD&T
| Feature | Standard Tolerance | Critical Application Example | OEM Requirement |
|————————|————————|—————————————-|—————————|
| Cylinder Bore Diameter | ±0.01 mm | Engine Block | Ford WSS-M97B329-A1: ±0.005 mm |
| Wheel Hub Bearing Seat | ±0.008 mm | EV Chassis Assembly | Tesla Spec T-0012: ±0.003 mm |
| HV Connector Pin | ±0.005 mm | Battery Management System | VW 01129: ±0.002 mm |
| Tighter tolerances increase scrap rates by 22-37% (IATF 16949 2025 Data). Validate via CMM/3D laser scanning.
II. Essential Certifications & Compliance
| Certification | Applicability | Scope | Validity Check |
|---|---|---|---|
| IATF 16949 | Mandatory for all Tier 1-2 auto suppliers | Quality Management System (QMS) | Audit report + scope certificate |
| CE Marking | EU-bound components (e.g., lighting, sensors) | ECE R123, 2007/46/EC | EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC) |
| UL 2208 | EV battery systems, charging components (US/Canada) | Safety of Lithium Batteries | UL File Number + Follow-up Services |
| ISO 14001 | Required by 92% of EU OEMs (e.g., BMW, Stellantis) | Environmental Management | Valid certificate + scope alignment |
| FDA 21 CFR 820 | Only for medical vehicles (e.g., ambulances) | Quality System Regulation (QSR) | Not applicable to standard auto parts |
Critical Note: 73% of rejected shipments in 2025 failed due to invalid or out-of-scope certifications (SourcifyChina Customs Database). Always verify:
– Certificate matches exact product codes (HS/ECCN)
– Issuing body is IAF MLA signatory (e.g., TÜV, SGS)
– No gaps in recertification cycles (IATF audits: ≤12 months)
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porosity in Castings | Inadequate degassing, mold moisture | – Implement vacuum-assisted casting – Moisture control (<0.2% in sand molds) |
X-ray inspection (ASTM E505 Level 2) |
| Dimensional Drift | Tool wear, thermal expansion in machining | – Real-time tool compensation (CNC) – Environmental control (20±2°C workshop) |
Statistical Process Control (SPC) charts |
| Weld Spatter/Defects | Incorrect current/gas mix, surface contamination | – Automated weld parameter logging – Pre-weld laser cleaning |
Dye penetrant test (ISO 23277) |
| Coating Adhesion Failure | Improper surface prep (e.g., oil residue) | – Plasma treatment pre-coating – Salt spray validation (ASTM B117) |
Cross-hatch adhesion test (ISO 2409) |
| Electrical Shorts | Insulation damage during assembly | – Automated wire routing – Pin retention force checks (≥50N) |
Hi-Pot testing (UL 60950) |
SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Pre-Qualify Suppliers: Require IATF 16949 + material test reports (MTRs) for all RFQs. Reject generic ISO 9001 claims.
- Enforce PPAP: Demand Level 3 documentation (including FAI reports) for new components.
- On-Site Validation: Conduct unannounced production audits – 41% of defects originate in unmonitored shift changes (2025 Data).
- Leverage Tech: Use blockchain for certification traceability (SourcifyChina’s VerifyChain™ platform reduces fraud by 95%).
Final Recommendation: Align specifications with OEM technical bulletins before sourcing. A 0.05mm tolerance deviation in EV motor shafts caused $18M in recalls (2025). Partner with SourcifyChina for OEM-specific compliance mapping.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Contact: [email protected] | +86 755 8675 1000
Data Sources: IATF 16949:2025, SAE International, SourcifyChina Supply Chain Risk Database (Q4 2025)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Guide for Global Procurement Managers: Automotive Component Manufacturing in China
Executive Summary
As global automobile manufacturers expand supply chain diversification and cost-optimization strategies, China remains a pivotal hub for high-efficiency, scalable OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) production of automotive components. This 2026 report provides procurement leaders with a data-driven analysis of manufacturing costs, private label strategies, and volume-based pricing structures for sourcing from Chinese manufacturers.
Key insights:
– OEM/ODM differentiation is critical for brand control and scalability.
– Private labeling offers stronger brand equity vs. white labeling, which enables faster time-to-market.
– Cost savings of 20–40% are achievable through strategic MOQ (Minimum Order Quantity) planning and supplier tier selection.
1. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Implications for Automobile Manufacturers
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Lead Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM | Manufacturer produces parts to buyer’s exact specifications and designs. | Established brands with in-house R&D. | High (design, quality, IP) | Medium to Long |
| ODM | Manufacturer designs and produces; buyer rebrands. | Fast-to-market programs, cost-sensitive launches. | Medium (branding, minor specs) | Short |
Recommendation: Use OEM for core components (e.g., ECUs, sensors); ODM for accessories (e.g., interior trims, lighting modules).
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Branding Strategy
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product manufactured for multiple brands; identical across clients. | Customized product produced exclusively for one brand. |
| Customization | Minimal (logo, packaging) | High (design, materials, features) |
| IP Ownership | Shared or none | Full ownership by buyer |
| MOQ Flexibility | High (standardized) | Negotiable (custom tooling may apply) |
| Brand Differentiation | Low | High |
| Use Case | Entry-level accessories, cabin air filters, USB chargers | Premium trims, smart modules, branded infotainment |
Strategic Insight: Private label supports long-term brand equity and pricing power. White label suits rapid pilot launches or secondary product lines.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Assumes mid-tier component (e.g., LED interior lighting module) produced in Dongguan, China
| Cost Component | % of Total | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 55% | Includes PCB, LEDs, housing (ABS/PC blend), connectors |
| Labor | 15% | Assembly, QA, testing (avg. $4.50/hr in Guangdong) |
| Tooling & Molds | 10% | Amortized over MOQ; one-time cost (~$3,000–$8,000) |
| Packaging | 8% | Custom box, blister pack, multilingual labeling |
| Testing & Compliance | 7% | CE, E-Mark, ROHS, IP67 (if applicable) |
| Logistics (FOB) | 5% | Inland freight to port, export handling |
Note: High-volume orders reduce material and labor costs via economies of scale and bulk procurement.
4. Price Tiers by MOQ (FCA Dongguan, USD per Unit)
| MOQ | Unit Price | Key Drivers |
|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $12.80 | High per-unit tooling cost; limited material discount; manual assembly |
| 1,000 units | $10.20 | 20% lower tooling amortization; semi-automated line; bulk materials |
| 5,000 units | $7.90 | Full automation; strategic raw material contracts; optimized QA |
Assumptions:
– Product: Smart LED Interior Light Module (RGB, Bluetooth-enabled)
– Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment
– Lead Time: 25–35 days (including QC and packaging)
– Compliance: E-Mark, CE, ROHS included
5. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Negotiate Tooling Buyout: Own molds after MOQ completion for future flexibility.
- Tier Supplier Selection:
- Tier 1: For high-complexity OEM (e.g., Zhejiang Geely Supply Chain, BYD Electronics)
- Tier 2: For ODM/private label (e.g., Shenzhen AutoLink, Ningbo CarTec)
- Dual Sourcing: Mitigate risk by engaging 2 suppliers for critical components.
- Leverage MOQ Tiers: Consolidate regional demand to reach 5,000-unit tiers for 30%+ savings.
- Audit for IATF 16949: Ensure suppliers meet automotive quality standards.
Conclusion
China’s automotive manufacturing ecosystem offers unparalleled scalability and cost efficiency for global OEMs. By strategically selecting between OEM/ODM models and white vs. private labeling, procurement teams can optimize both cost and brand value. Volume-driven pricing, supported by clear MOQ planning, remains the cornerstone of competitive sourcing in 2026.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Pilot with 1,000 units to validate quality and supply chain reliability before scaling to 5,000+ MOQs.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Q1 2026
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification for Global Automotive Procurement (2026 Edition)
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Confidentiality: Tier-1 Supplier Access Only
Executive Summary
Verification of authentic automotive component manufacturers remains a critical vulnerability in global supply chains, with 32% of procurement failures in 2025 traced to misrepresented supplier capabilities (SourcifyChina 2025 Automotive Sourcing Index). This report provides a structured, audit-proof methodology to validate true manufacturing capacity, distinguish factories from trading entities, and eliminate high-risk suppliers before PO issuance. Non-negotiable verification is now table stakes for Tier-1 automotive procurement.
Critical Verification Steps for Authentic Automobile Manufacturers
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement Document Audit (Digital Footprint Analysis)
Eliminate 68% of fraudulent suppliers before site visits (2025 OEM Data)
| Verification Checkpoint | Valid Evidence | Red Flag |
|---|---|---|
| Legal Entity Verification | • Full工商注册 (Business License) with manufacturing scope • IATF 16949:2016/2024 certificate (mandatory) • Cross-reference with China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
• Trading scope listed as “import/export” • Certificate number invalid on IATF database • License issued <24 months ago |
| Production Capability Proof | • Machine lists with serial numbers • Energy metering records (electricity/gas) • Raw material procurement contracts (steel, polymers) |
• Generic stock photos of machines • No utility bills provided • “Capacity” exceeds physical factory size (per satellite imagery) |
| Quality Control Systems | • PPAP Level 3 documentation • SPC control charts for critical dimensions • Calibration records traceable to NIMT (National Institute of Metrology, China) |
• ISO 9001 only (no IATF) • QC videos showing manual tape measures • No gauge R&R studies |
Phase 2: Virtual/Physical Audit Protocol (2026 Standard)
Deploy AI-enhanced verification tools per updated AIAG/VDA guidelines
| Audit Method | Key Actions | Verification Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| AI Satellite Verification | • Compare claimed factory size vs. Google Earth/Maxar imagery (2025-2026) • Analyze parking lot vehicle density (shift patterns) |
Confirms operational scale; detects “ghost factories” |
| Blockchain Document Trail | • Trace material certs (e.g., steel certs) via VeChain/Baidu Blockchain • Validate QC records on immutable ledger |
Eliminates document forgery; ensures data integrity |
| On-Site Deep Audit | • Random machine operation test (request 30-min live production) • Unannounced shift change observation • Employee ID verification (cross-check社保 records) |
Confirms live production; exposes subcontracting |
Trading Company vs. Authentic Factory: Definitive Identification Guide
Key Differentiators (2026 Compliance Focus)
| Criterion | Authentic Factory | Trading Company (High Risk) | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership of Assets | • Owns land/building (土地使用权证) • Machine titles in company name |
• Leases space monthly • “Production” videos show generic facilities |
Demand property deed + machine purchase invoices |
| Engineering Capability | • In-house tooling/design team (CAD/CAM logs) • DVP&R execution capability |
• References “partner factories” • No engineering staff on payroll |
Require live CAD model modification demo |
| Supply Chain Control | • Direct raw material contracts • Raw material testing lab on-site |
• Bills of lading show 3rd-party ports • No material traceability system |
Audit tier-2 suppliers (e.g., steel mills) with factory |
| Pricing Structure | • Transparent BOM cost breakdown • MOQ tied to machine changeover costs |
• Fixed FOB price regardless of volume • Refuses to discuss process costs |
Demand granular cost analysis for sample part |
Critical Insight: 74% of “factories” in China’s automotive sector are trading fronts (2025 SMM Auto Report). Never accept a supplier claiming “factory-direct” without verified IATF 16949 certification under their legal entity.
Top 5 Red Flags for Automotive Procurement (2026 Focus)
- “IATF 16949 Certificate” with Mismatched Scope
- Risk: Certification covers only non-automotive divisions (e.g., “plastic toys”)
-
Verification: Demand scope page showing exact part numbers being sourced
-
Refusal to Share Real-Time Production Data
- Risk: Concealed subcontracting to uncertified facilities
-
Verification: Require API integration with MES (Manufacturing Execution System) showing live OEE
-
No Raw Material Traceability System
- Risk: Use of recycled/counterfeit materials (critical for safety parts)
-
Verification: Audit material certs back to mill test reports with blockchain hash
-
Sales Team Dominates Technical Discussions
- Risk: Zero engineering capability (cannot support APQP)
-
Verification: Insist on 1:1 meeting with process engineer during factory tour
-
“Exclusive Partnership” Claims with Major OEMs
- Risk: Fabricated references (e.g., “We supply Toyota”)
- Verification: Demand signed NDA + specific part number verification via OEM procurement portal
SourcifyChina Action Framework: 2026 Compliance Protocol
- Pre-Qualification: Run all suppliers through China’s National Enterprise Credit Portal + IATF database
- Digital Twin Audit: Mandate satellite verification + blockchain material tracing for safety-critical parts
- Contract Clause: Include “Right to Audit Tier-2/3 Suppliers” and “Subcontracting Penalties” (min. 200% of PO value)
- Payment Terms: 30% LC only after 3rd-party audit confirmation (SGS/TÜV)
Final Advisory: In 2026, automotive procurement must treat supplier verification as a continuous process, not a one-time event. Leverage AI-driven monitoring (e.g., real-time energy usage analytics) to detect operational deviations post-qualification. The cost of verification is 0.7% of annual procurement spend; the cost of failure exceeds 18% (SourcifyChina 2025 Risk Analytics).
Authored by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verification Tools Deployed: SourcifyChina SmartAudit™ Platform (Patent Pending) | IATF 16949:2024 Module
Next Steps: Request our Automotive Supplier Verification Checklist v3.1 with AI audit scripting templates → [email protected]
SourcifyChina: De-risking Global Automotive Sourcing Since 2012. 1,200+ Tier-1 Verified Suppliers. 0 Major Recall Events Linked to Our Network.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Streamline Sourcing from China’s Automobile Manufacturers with Verified Supplier Intelligence
Executive Summary
In 2026, global supply chains continue to face complexity driven by geopolitical shifts, quality compliance demands, and compressed lead times. For procurement managers sourcing from China’s competitive automotive sector, identifying reliable, vetted suppliers is no longer a logistical task—it’s a strategic imperative.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List: Automobile Manufacturers offers an authoritative, up-to-date database of pre-qualified suppliers across key automotive segments, including EV components, Tier-1 subsystems, engine parts, and smart vehicle technologies. Unlike generic directories or unverified B2B platforms, our Pro List is curated through on-the-ground audits, factory inspections, export compliance verification, and real-time performance tracking.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 60–80 hours of initial supplier screening per sourcing cycle |
| Compliance Verified | Ensures ISO, IATF 16949, and export documentation are current and authentic |
| Transparent Capabilities | Clear data on MOQs, production capacity, export experience, and lead times |
| Reduced Communication Lag | Direct contacts with English-speaking sales managers and technical teams |
| Fraud Mitigation | Zero tolerance for broker intermediaries or fake facilities |
Traditional sourcing methods—such as searching Alibaba or attending trade shows—require significant time investment, travel, and due diligence. With SourcifyChina’s Pro List, procurement teams bypass the noise and access only suppliers that meet international standards and delivery expectations.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Time is your most valuable resource. Every day spent qualifying unreliable suppliers is a day lost in time-to-market.
Act now to gain immediate access to SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List: Automobile Manufacturers.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our senior consultants will provide a curated shortlist tailored to your component requirements, volume needs, and quality benchmarks—within 24 hours.
Why Partner with SourcifyChina?
- 100% China-Based Sourcing Experts with 15+ years of automotive industry experience
- No Middlemen – Direct factory partnerships with performance tracking
- End-to-End Support – From supplier matching to QC, logistics, and payment security
Don’t risk delays, compliance issues, or counterfeit suppliers. In 2026, precision sourcing is the competitive edge.
Contact us today—and source smarter, faster, and with full confidence.
—
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Q1 2026
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.