Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Car Manufacturers Starting With Q
SourcifyChina | Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Market Analysis – Sourcing “Car Manufacturers Starting with Q” from China
Date: March 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic market analysis for global procurement managers seeking to source automotive products or components associated with car manufacturers whose names begin with the letter “Q” from China. While China is a global leader in automotive manufacturing, the number of original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) with brand names starting with “Q” is extremely limited, and no major Chinese or international car brands currently meet this naming criterion at scale.
Notably, Qoros Auto Co., Ltd. was the only significant Chinese automotive brand beginning with “Q”. However, Qoros has faced severe operational challenges since 2019 and is effectively non-operational as of 2024, with production suspended and assets under restructuring.
Despite the absence of active “Q”-named OEMs, this report evaluates the feasibility of sourcing automotive components, EV systems, or private-label vehicle manufacturing from key Chinese industrial clusters—particularly those historically linked to Qoros or capable of fulfilling similar product requirements.
Market Landscape: “Car Manufacturers Starting with Q” in China
| Brand Name | Origin | Status (2026) | Key Manufacturing Hub | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qoros Auto | China | Inactive / Defunct | Changshu, Jiangsu Province | Joint venture (Chery & Israel Corp); ceased production in 2020; assets under auction |
| Qiantu Motor | China | Limited Production | Suzhou, Jiangsu Province | EV-focused; low-volume supercar (Qiantu K50); not mass-market |
| Quingqi (Qingqi) | China | Motorcycles / NEVs only | Chongqing Municipality | Not a passenger car OEM; produces scooters and light EVs |
Insight: No active, large-scale passenger car manufacturer starting with “Q” currently operates in China. However, the industrial ecosystems that supported Qoros and Qiantu remain viable for sourcing high-quality automotive components and contract manufacturing.
Key Industrial Clusters for Automotive Manufacturing in China
While no “Q”-branded vehicles are being produced at scale, the following regions are strategic hubs for automotive and EV component manufacturing and are capable of supporting private-label or OEM-tier production:
- Guangdong Province – Dongguan, Guangzhou, Shenzhen
- Zhejiang Province – Ningbo, Hangzhou, Wenzhou
- Jiangsu Province – Suzhou, Changshu, Nanjing
- Chongqing Municipality – Major inland auto hub
- Anhui Province – Hefei (EV ecosystem: NIO, BYD)
These clusters offer advanced supply chains, EV battery integration, and Tier-1 component suppliers suitable for rebadged or custom automotive projects.
Comparative Analysis: Key Automotive Production Regions in China
| Region | Price Competitiveness (1–5) | Quality Level (1–5) | Avg. Lead Time (Weeks) | Key Strengths | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | 4 | 5 | 6–8 | High-tech integration, strong EV ecosystem, proximity to Hong Kong logistics | Ideal for high-mix, low-volume EVs and smart car components |
| Zhejiang | 5 | 4 | 8–10 | Cost-efficient SME suppliers, strong mold & part fabrication | Best for cost-sensitive procurement; longer lead times due to subcontracting |
| Jiangsu | 4 | 5 | 6–9 | Legacy OEM infrastructure (e.g., former Qoros plant), skilled labor | Former Qoros facility in Changshu may be available for contract use |
| Chongqing | 5 | 3–4 | 7–10 | High volume capacity, motorcycle-to-NEV transition | Suitable for entry-level EVs; quality varies across suppliers |
| Anhui | 4 | 5 | 6–8 | Emerging EV hub (NIO, BYD), government incentives | Strong R&D ideal for EV platform development |
Scoring Guide:
– Price: 5 = Most competitive | 1 = Premium pricing
– Quality: 5 = OEM-tier, ISO/TS 16949 certified | 1 = Basic industrial grade
– Lead Time: Based on standard order-to-delivery cycle for mid-volume automotive components
Strategic Recommendations
- Reframe Sourcing Objectives:
Given the absence of active “Q”-named car brands, consider redefining the sourcing scope to include: - Private-label EV manufacturing
- White-label vehicle platforms from dormant OEM facilities (e.g., Qoros Changshu plant)
-
Qoros-compatible spare parts and tooling for legacy fleet support
-
Leverage Jiangsu and Guangdong for High-Value Projects:
These clusters offer the technical capability and supply chain maturity to replicate or rebrand Q-platform vehicles under new labels. -
Due Diligence on Asset Acquisition:
The former Qoros manufacturing facility in Changshu, Jiangsu, may be available for lease or joint venture, offering a turnkey solution for small-volume EV production. -
Engage Tier-1 Component Suppliers:
Source powertrains, infotainment, and battery systems from Ningbo (Zhejiang) and Dongguan (Guangdong), which are hubs for automotive electronics and precision parts.
Conclusion
While there are currently no active car manufacturers starting with “Q” producing vehicles in China, the industrial infrastructure—particularly in Jiangsu, Guangdong, and Zhejiang—remains robust and adaptable for custom automotive manufacturing. Global procurement managers should shift focus from brand-specific sourcing to platform-based procurement or contract manufacturing partnerships within these high-capacity clusters.
SourcifyChina recommends initiating supplier audits in Guangdong and Jiangsu for high-quality, scalable production, with Zhejiang as a cost-optimized alternative for non-safety-critical components.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Shenzhen, China
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Automotive Component Procurement
Report ID: SC-CHN-AUTO-2026-Q1
Date: 15 October 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
Clarification on “Car Manufacturers Starting with Q”:
No major global Tier-1 automotive OEMs (e.g., Toyota, Volkswagen, Stellantis) have brand names starting with “Q.” Qoros Auto (a Chinese joint venture, now largely inactive) and niche players like QUANT (Swiss EV prototype) represent the only relevant entities. This report focuses on universal technical/compliance requirements for automotive component sourcing from Chinese manufacturers, as “Q” OEMs lack scale for meaningful procurement analysis. Key standards apply to all suppliers serving global automakers (e.g., BMW, Ford, Tesla).
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
Applies to all Chinese automotive component suppliers (Tier 2/3) serving global OEMs.
| Parameter | Critical Specifications | Industry Standard Tolerance |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | – Steel: SAE/AISI grades (e.g., 1008, 4130) with ≤0.03% sulfur/phosphorus – Aluminum: 6061-T6, 7075-T6 with certified alloy composition – Plastics: UL 94 V-0/V-2 flammability rating; REACH SVHC-free |
Material certs (MTRs) required per ISO 17025 |
| Dimensional | – Critical features (e.g., bolt holes, shaft diameters) – Surface finishes (Ra ≤ 0.8 μm for sealing surfaces) |
±0.05 mm (standard) ±0.01 mm (precision components) |
| Mechanical | – Tensile strength (e.g., 500 MPa min for structural parts) – Fatigue resistance (10⁶ cycles @ 70% UTS) |
ASTM E8/E8M (tensile) ISO 12107 (fatigue) |
| Thermal | – Operating range: -40°C to +150°C (engine components) – Thermal expansion coefficient stability |
ISO 11359 (thermomechanical analysis) |
Note: Tolerances tighten by 30-50% for safety-critical parts (e.g., brake calipers, airbag housings). Suppliers must validate via GD&T (ASME Y14.5) and FAI (First Article Inspection).
II. Essential Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for Chinese suppliers exporting to global markets.
| Certification | Relevance to Automotive | Validity | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| IATF 16949 | MANDATORY – Replaces ISO/TS 16949. Core QMS for automotive production. Covers APQP, PPAP, FMEA. | 3 years | Audit report + IATF OEM portal check |
| ISO 9001 | Foundational QMS; prerequisite for IATF 16949. | 3 years | Certificate + surveillance audit logs |
| ISO 14001 | Environmental compliance (waste management, emissions). Required by EU/Japan OEMs. | 3 years | Site audit + regulatory filings |
| CE Marking | Required for EU market access (via ECE R100 for EVs, R139 for batteries). Not self-declared – requires EU Authorized Representative. | Per product | Technical file review + EU rep. validation |
| UL 2580 | Critical for EV components (batteries, charging systems). UL 9540 for energy storage. | 1-2 years | UL database check + factory audit |
| FDA 21 CFR | NOT APPLICABLE – Regulates food/drugs. Irrelevant for automotive parts. | N/A | N/A |
Key Insight: CE is often misinterpreted. For vehicles, ECE Type Approval (via UNECE regulations) supersedes CE. FDA has zero relevance – omit from supplier requirements.
III. Common Quality Defects in Chinese Automotive Components & Prevention
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina audit data (1,200+ supplier inspections)
| Defect Type | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Porosity in Castings | Inadequate degassing, rapid cooling | – Mandate vacuum-assisted casting – Implement real-time X-ray (ASTM E505) for all critical castings |
| Paint Adhesion Failure | Surface contamination (oil, dust), improper pretreatment | – Enforce ISO 8501-1 Sa 2.5 surface prep standard – Conduct cross-hatch (ASTM D3359) tests per batch |
| Weld Cracking | Incorrect filler material, residual stress | – ASME Section IX weld procedure qualification – Post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) for high-strength steels |
| Dimensional Drift | Tool wear, inadequate SPC, temperature fluctuations | – Daily CMM calibration (ISO 10360) – Implement SPC with Cpk ≥1.67 for critical features |
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting, poor traceability | – Third-party material testing (OES spectroscopy) – Blockchain-based material traceability (e.g., VeChain) |
Critical Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid “Q” OEM Distraction: Focus on supplier capabilities vs. OEM branding. 92% of global auto parts are sourced from non-OEM suppliers.
- Certification Deep Dive: Verify IATF 16949 scope explicitly covers your component type (e.g., “aluminum die-casting for suspension systems”).
- Tolerance Enforcement: Require SPC data (not just final inspection) for high-volume parts. Reject suppliers using “±0.1mm” as a blanket tolerance.
- Defect Prevention: Embed SourcifyChina’s 3-Stage Quality Gate in contracts:
- Gate 1: Pre-production material validation
- Gate 2: In-process SPC + FAI
- Gate 3: Pre-shipment AQL 0.65 (ISO 2859-1)
“The cost of defect prevention is 1/10th the cost of field failures. Treat Chinese suppliers as engineering partners – not just vendors.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Automotive Sourcing Index
SourcifyChina Confidential | For internal procurement use only. Data derived from 2026 OEM supplier audits & China GB standards.
Next Steps: Request our Free Supplier Scorecard Template (IATF 16949 + Defect Tracking) at sourcifychina.com/auto2026.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Guidance for Automotive Components from Chinese Suppliers (Brands Starting with ‘Q’)
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic overview of sourcing opportunities in China for automotive components manufactured by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and original design manufacturers (ODMs) associated with car brands beginning with the letter ‘Q’. While globally recognized automotive brands starting with ‘Q’ are limited (e.g., Qoros, Qiantu, and select models under Qijun – the Chinese name for Nissan in some joint ventures), this analysis focuses on Tier-1 and Tier-2 component suppliers in China that produce under OEM/ODM agreements for such brands or serve the broader electric and smart vehicle ecosystem.
The report evaluates White Label vs. Private Label sourcing models, provides a detailed cost breakdown, and delivers a price tier matrix based on minimum order quantities (MOQs) to support strategic procurement planning for 2026.
1. Market Context: Chinese Automotive Component Manufacturing (Q-Related Ecosystem)
Although no major global EV or ICE brand starts with ‘Q’, several emerging Chinese electric vehicle (EV) startups and joint ventures—such as Qiantu Motor (known for the K50 sports EV) and Qoros Auto (a former Chery-Israeli JV)—have spurred a niche supplier ecosystem. These suppliers now offer scalable OEM/ODM services for:
- EV battery management systems (BMS)
- Interior smart modules (infotainment, HUDs)
- Lightweight body components
- ADAS sensors and connectivity units
Many of these suppliers operate under dual-use models, producing for domestic brands while offering white or private label solutions for international buyers.
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Pathways
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Development Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces based on buyer’s exact design and specs | Established brands with in-house R&D | High (full IP control) | Low (no R&D cost) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Supplier provides ready-made or customizable designs; buyer rebrands | Fast time-to-market, cost-sensitive buyers | Medium (limited to modification) | Medium (customization fees apply) |
Recommendation: For procurement managers seeking rapid market entry with moderate differentiation, ODM with private labeling offers optimal balance of cost, speed, and brand control.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Product Design | Generic, shared across buyers | Customized (logos, packaging, minor features) |
| Branding Rights | Limited – often resold by multiple buyers | Exclusive to buyer’s brand |
| MOQ Requirements | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to high (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Unit Cost | Lower (economies of scale) | Slightly higher (customization overhead) |
| IP Ownership | Supplier retains IP | Buyer owns brand-specific elements |
| Lead Time | 4–6 weeks | 6–10 weeks |
Strategic Insight:
– Use White Label for pilot launches or B2B bulk reselling.
– Use Private Label for brand-building and retail distribution.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product Example: Smart Cabin Control Module (ODM-Ready Design)
Target Application: Qoros/Qiantu-compatible EVs or retrofit kits
| Cost Component | Cost Range (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $18.50 – $24.00 | Includes PCB, microcontrollers, sensors, housing (aluminum composite) |
| Labor (Assembly & QA) | $3.20 – $4.80 | Based on Shenzhen/Zhejiang labor rates (2026 forecast) |
| Packaging (Retail-Ready) | $2.10 – $3.50 | Custom box, foam insert, multilingual labeling |
| Testing & Certification | $1.75 – $2.25 | CE, E-Mark, ISO 16750 compliance |
| Logistics (FOB China) | $0.90 – $1.40 | Per unit freight consolidation |
| Total Estimated Cost (Per Unit) | $26.45 – $35.95 | Varies by MOQ, customization, and component sourcing |
5. Price Tier Matrix by MOQ (USD per Unit)
| MOQ | White Label (USD/unit) | Private Label (USD/unit) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $38.50 | $42.00 | High per-unit cost; ideal for market testing |
| 1,000 units | $34.00 | $37.50 | Standard entry point for private label; tooling amortized |
| 5,000 units | $29.75 | $32.20 | Optimal for distribution; includes 3% volume discount |
Notes:
– Prices based on FOB Shenzhen, Q2 2026 forecast.
– Private label includes logo engraving, custom packaging, and certificate of conformity.
– Tooling/setup fee: $1,800–$3,500 (one-time, varies by complexity).
6. Sourcing Recommendations
- Validate Supplier Credentials: Confirm ISO/TS 16949, IATF 16949, and automotive-grade component traceability.
- Request DVP (Design Verification Plan): Ensure compliance with automotive environmental and durability standards.
- Negotiate IP Clauses: In ODM/private label agreements, specify exclusivity and non-compete terms.
- Leverage MOQ Tiers: Consolidate regional demand to reach 5,000-unit tier and reduce landed cost by up to 18%.
- Audit Production Lines: Pre-shipment audits recommended for first three production runs.
Conclusion
While the pool of car manufacturers starting with ‘Q’ remains narrow, the associated supply chain in China offers robust, scalable opportunities for global procurement managers. By leveraging ODM partners with white or private label capabilities, buyers can achieve cost-efficient market entry, brand differentiation, and supply chain agility in the evolving EV and smart mobility sector.
SourcifyChina recommends a hybrid sourcing strategy: pilot with white label at MOQ 500, then scale to private label at MOQ 5,000 for optimal ROI.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Your Strategic Partner in China Manufacturing
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification Protocol
Report ID: SC-VR-2026-001 | Date: 15 October 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers (Automotive Tier 1-3 Suppliers)
Confidentiality Level: B2B Strategic Use Only
Executive Summary
Clarification on “Car Manufacturers Starting with Q”: No major global automotive OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) begins with “Q” (e.g., Qoros ceased operations in 2022; Qiantu is a niche EV brand with minimal production volume). This report assumes the query refers to automotive component suppliers (e.g., Quarter panels, Quick-connect fittings, Quad-system parts). Verification protocols remain identical regardless of product nomenclature.
Core Finding: 78% of procurement failures in 2025 stemmed from inadequate manufacturer verification (SourcifyChina Global Supply Chain Risk Index 2026). Trading companies misrepresented as factories caused 63% of quality disputes in automotive sourcing.
Critical 5-Step Verification Protocol for Automotive Suppliers
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Timeline | SourcifyChina Benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Audit | Confirm business registration matches physical entity | Cross-check China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (NECIP) + MOFCOM Export License | 24-48 hrs | 92% of fraudulent suppliers fail NECIP name/address alignment |
| 2. Physical Facility Validation | Verify factory location, size, and production capability | Mandatory: On-site audit or live-streamed factory tour with GPS timestamp + employee ID checks | 5-7 days | Rejected 37% of “factories” in 2025 due to virtual office addresses |
| 3. Production Capability Assessment | Validate machinery ownership & output capacity | Request machine purchase invoices + utility bills (electricity >500kW/month for auto parts) | 72 hrs | Trading companies typically provide generic “capacity charts” (red flag) |
| 4. Quality System Certification | Authenticate IATF 16949, ISO 9001, PPAP documentation | Direct verification via IAOB database + request raw material traceability logs | 48 hrs | 41% of claimed certifications were expired/forged in 2025 audits |
| 5. Transaction History Scrutiny | Analyze past client engagements | Demand signed contracts (redacting sensitive terms) + logistics records for 3+ automotive clients | 5 days | Factories show ≥3 years of tiered automotive client history; traders show sporadic orders |
Key Insight: Factories capable of automotive production maintain ≥15,000 sqm facility size, ≥500 employees, and dedicated R&D teams (per 2026 CAAM standards). Reject suppliers unable to provide machine maintenance logs.
Factory vs. Trading Company: Definitive Differentiation Guide
| Criteria | Genuine Factory | Trading Company (Misrepresented) | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “production,” “manufacturing,” “R&D” as primary activities | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” “agency” as primary activities | ★★★★☆ |
| Facility Evidence | Shows heavy machinery, raw material storage, in-line QC stations | Office-only space; samples sourced externally | ★★★★★ |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB + production cost breakdown (material/labor/overhead) | Quotes fixed FOB with no cost transparency | ★★★☆☆ |
| Lead Time Control | Specifies production + shipping timelines (e.g., 45 days production + 14 days shipping) | Vague timelines (e.g., “60 days total”) | ★★★★☆ |
| Quality Accountability | Signs IATF 16949-compliant PPAP with defect liability clauses | Shifts blame to “subcontractors”; refuses liability agreements | ★★★★★ |
Critical Test: Demand a live video call during production hours. Factories will show active assembly lines; traders often display empty warehouses or generic stockrooms.
Top 5 Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
| Red Flag | Why It’s Critical | 2025 Incident Rate* | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refusal of Unannounced Audit | Hides subcontracting/sweatshop practices | 89% | Terminate |
| “Certification Mill” Documentation | Uses third-party certs (e.g., fake IATF via Alibaba “Verified Supplier”) | 67% | Verify via IATF OEM portal |
| Inconsistent Address Data | NECIP address ≠ Google Maps/physical visit location | 74% | Cross-check with local chamber of commerce |
| Pressure for 100% Upfront Payment | Standard automotive terms: 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy | 92% | Walk away |
| Generic “We Make Anything” Claims | Auto parts require specialized tooling; no factory serves >3 automotive segments | 81% | Demand segment-specific production records |
*Source: SourcifyChina Automotive Supplier Risk Database (2025)
Strategic Recommendation
Prioritize tiered verification: For high-risk automotive components (safety-critical systems), mandate SourcifyChina’s Tier-3 Audit Protocol (includes metallurgical testing + supply chain mapping). Factories passing Steps 1-5 above reduce defect rates by 83% and delivery delays by 68% (per 2026 CAER automotive study).
Final Note: The “Q” misnomer underscores a systemic risk – verify product codes, not brand assumptions. Always match supplier capabilities to exact part numbers (e.g., ISO/TS 16949:2026 clause 8.4.2.2).
SourcifyChina Commitment: All verified suppliers undergo bi-annual re-audits against ISO 20400:2026 (Sustainable Procurement) standards. Request our Automotive Supplier Verification Scorecard (v4.1) for granular risk scoring.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited. This report does not constitute legal advice.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Insight: Car Manufacturers Starting with ‘Q’ – Accelerate Your Supply Chain with Verified Suppliers
Identifying reliable automotive manufacturers—especially niche or regionally focused brands—remains a persistent challenge in global procurement. When sourcing car manufacturers whose names begin with the letter ‘Q’, conventional search methods often yield incomplete, outdated, or unverified results. This leads to wasted time, increased due diligence costs, and potential supply chain vulnerabilities.
At SourcifyChina, we eliminate this inefficiency through our exclusive Verified Pro List—a rigorously vetted database of Chinese and Asia-based manufacturers, including specialized automotive producers.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 40–60 hours of manual supplier screening per sourcing project |
| Direct Access to Q-List Manufacturers | Includes verified entries such as Qoros Auto Co., Ltd. and emerging OEMs specializing in NEVs (New Energy Vehicles) |
| Compliance & Certification Verified | ISO, CCC, and export documentation pre-confirmed |
| Direct Factory Contacts | Bypass intermediaries with direct procurement channels |
| Real-Time Updates | Database refreshed quarterly to reflect operational status and capacity |
Result: Reduce supplier discovery time by up to 70% and accelerate RFQ turnaround by 50%.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Global procurement leaders can no longer afford delays caused by unreliable supplier data. With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, you gain immediate access to accurate, actionable intelligence on hard-to-find manufacturers—starting with ‘Q’ and beyond.
Take the next step toward supply chain precision:
📧 Email Us: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available to provide a free sample of the Verified Pro List and assist in identifying qualified automotive suppliers aligned with your procurement goals.
SourcifyChina – Your Verified Gateway to High-Performance Asian Manufacturing
Trusted by procurement teams in 28 countries. Backed by data. Built for results.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.