Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Closet Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Closet Manufacturers from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Author: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for closet manufacturing, offering a compelling combination of scale, cost efficiency, and evolving technological capabilities. With increasing demand for modular, customizable, and space-optimized storage solutions—particularly in urban housing and commercial interiors—procurement managers are turning to Chinese manufacturers to meet volume and innovation targets.
This report provides a strategic overview of the Chinese closet manufacturing landscape, identifying key industrial clusters, evaluating regional strengths, and delivering a comparative analysis to support informed sourcing decisions in 2026.
Market Overview: Closet Manufacturing in China
Closet systems in China encompass a broad product range, including:
– Modular wardrobes
– Sliding and hinged door systems
– Walk-in closets
– Custom-fit cabinetry
– Smart storage solutions (integrated lighting, IoT-enabled features)
The sector is highly fragmented but increasingly consolidated around specialized industrial clusters. Manufacturers range from OEM/ODM exporters to premium custom solution providers, with growing adoption of automation, CNC processing, and ERP systems to improve consistency and scalability.
Key Industrial Clusters for Closet Manufacturing
China’s closet manufacturing is concentrated in two primary provinces, each with distinct advantages:
1. Guangdong Province – Foshan & Guangzhou
- Focus: High-volume production, export-oriented, integration with furniture and home interiors supply chains
- Notable Hubs: Nanhai District (Foshan), Huadu District (Guangzhou)
- Strengths: Advanced surface finishing (melamine, PVC, wood veneer), strong export logistics, proximity to Hong Kong and Shenzhen ports
- Specialization: Mid-to-high-end modular closets, integration with smart home systems
2. Zhejiang Province – Huzhou & Hangzhou
- Focus: Cost-competitive production, eco-materials, OEM/ODM efficiency
- Notable Hubs: Deqing County (Huzhou), Yuhang District (Hangzhou)
- Strengths: Government-backed green manufacturing initiatives, high concentration of panel and hardware suppliers, strong R&D in eco-composites
- Specialization: Budget to mid-range closets, flat-pack solutions, E1/E0 MDF and particleboard expertise
Comparative Analysis: Guangdong vs Zhejiang
The following table compares the two leading regions based on key procurement criteria relevant to global buyers in 2026.
| Criteria | Guangdong (Foshan/Guangzhou) | Zhejiang (Huzhou/Hangzhou) | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Price (USD/Unit) | $180 – $320 (mid to high tier) | $120 – $240 (budget to mid tier) | Zhejiang offers ~25–30% cost advantage for standard configurations |
| Quality Tier | High – Premium finishes, tight tolerances, QC systems (ISO 9001 common) | Medium to High – Improving rapidly; strong in structural integrity, variable finish quality | Guangdong preferred for luxury or custom retail; Zhejiang suitable for mass-market |
| Lead Time (Production + Port) | 35–50 days (incl. QC & export prep) | 30–45 days (efficient inland logistics) | Zhejiang marginally faster due to shorter inland transport to Shanghai/Ningbo ports |
| Material Innovation | High – Veneer, acrylic, laminated glass, smart integration | Medium – Strong in E0 MDF, bamboo composites, recyclable panels | Guangdong leads in design-forward and tech-enabled closets |
| Customization Capability | Excellent – Full CAD/CAM integration, agile prototyping | Good – Standardized modules; limited complex customization | Guangdong better for B2B projects requiring bespoke dimensions or branding |
| Export Readiness | High – Experienced in LCL/FCL, documentation, EU/US compliance | Medium-High – Growing export infrastructure; some require third-party QC oversight | Guangdong reduces compliance risk for regulated markets (EU, US, AU) |
Emerging Trends Impacting Sourcing (2026)
- Sustainability Compliance: EU Green Deal and U.S. CARB Phase 3 are driving demand for E0/E1 formaldehyde-free panels. Zhejiang leads in green certifications; Guangdong catching up.
- Automation & Industry 4.0: Top-tier factories in both regions now use automated cutting lines and robotic assembly, reducing labor dependency and improving consistency.
- Nearshoring Pressures: While China remains cost-effective, procurement managers are dual-sourcing with Vietnam or Thailand for risk mitigation—though closet-specific capacity remains limited outside China.
- Smart Integration: Demand for closets with built-in LED, charging stations, or app-controlled features is rising. Guangdong has a 12–18 month lead in this segment.
Sourcing Recommendations
| Procurement Objective | Recommended Region | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Premium Custom Projects (Luxury Residences, Hotels) | Guangdong | Superior finish quality, design flexibility, and integration capability |
| High-Volume Retail (Flat-Pack, E-commerce) | Zhejiang | Lower landed cost, faster turnaround, proven scalability |
| Sustainability-Focused Contracts | Zhejiang (Deqing) | Higher concentration of FSC-certified and low-emission material suppliers |
| Smart/Connected Storage Solutions | Guangdong (Foshan) | Advanced R&D partnerships with electronics integrators |
Conclusion
Guangdong and Zhejiang represent complementary pillars of China’s closet manufacturing ecosystem. Guangdong excels in quality, innovation, and export maturity—ideal for premium and custom projects. Zhejiang offers compelling cost efficiency and sustainability credentials, making it optimal for high-volume, standardized orders.
Global procurement managers should adopt a tiered sourcing strategy, leveraging Guangdong for innovation and quality-critical applications, and Zhejiang for volume-driven, cost-sensitive contracts. Due diligence on factory certifications, IP protection, and logistics coordination remains essential to maximize ROI and mitigate supply chain risk in 2026.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
China Sourcing Intelligence | B2B Supply Chain Optimization
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Technical & Compliance Framework for Closet Manufacturing (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
Global demand for modular closet systems is projected to grow at 6.2% CAGR through 2026, driven by urbanization and space-optimization trends. However, 38% of quality failures in 2025 stemmed from inadequate material specification oversight and non-compliant finishing processes. This report details critical technical parameters, certification mandates, and defect mitigation protocols to de-risk sourcing from manufacturing hubs (primarily China, Vietnam, Mexico). Key action item: Integrate tolerance validation into pre-shipment inspection (PSI) protocols to reduce field failures by ≥25%.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
A. Material Specifications (Non-Negotiable Baseline)
| Parameter | Minimum Standard | Verification Method | Critical Failure Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Panel Core | CARB P2/EPA TSCA Title VI compliant MDF (≥720 kg/m³ density) or plywood (≥11-ply, void-free) | Lab test: Formaldehyde emission ≤0.05 ppm (EN 717-1) | Structural warping, VOC exposure |
| Edge Banding | ABS/PVC ≥2.0mm thickness; seamless adhesion (peel strength ≥1.2 N/mm) | Tensile test per ASTM D903; visual inspection under 100 lux | Delamination, moisture ingress |
| Hardware | Steel hinges (≥50,000-cycle test per ANSI/BHMA A156.1); Drawer slides (≥45kg dynamic load) | Cycle testing report; load test certificate | Premature mechanism failure |
| Finish Coating | UV-cured acrylic/polyester; ≥35μm dry film thickness; ΔE≤1.5 color tolerance | Spectrophotometer (ISO 7724); cross-hatch adhesion test (ISO 2409) | Chipping, inconsistent aesthetics |
B. Dimensional Tolerances (Per ANSI A208.1)
| Component | Critical Tolerance | Measurement Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Carcass Frame | ±1.0mm (height/width) | Laser alignment jig + digital caliper at 4 points |
| Shelf Alignment | ±0.5mm (levelness) | Straight-edge gauge + feeler gauge |
| Door Gap | 2.5±0.3mm (uniform) | Precision gap template at 6 points |
| Drilling Holes | ±0.2mm (position) | Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) |
Procurement Action: Require suppliers to provide 3-point tolerance validation reports per batch. Tolerances beyond ±15% of specified values trigger automatic batch rejection.
II. Essential Compliance Certifications (2026 Mandates)
Non-compliance = Market access denial in target regions. Verify via SourcifyChina’s Certification Authenticity Portal (CAP).
| Certification | Scope Applicability | Key Requirements | Regional Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Mark | EU/EEA | EN 14074 (furniture stability); EN 71-3 (toxicity) | Mandatory for EU sales |
| UL GREENGUARD Gold | Global (premium markets) | VOC emissions ≤0.022 mg/m³ (formaldehyde) | Required by 72% of US commercial projects |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Global (baseline) | Documented QC process; corrective action logs | Non-negotiable for Tier-1 OEMs |
| FSC/PEFC | EU/US (sustainable sourcing) | Chain-of-custody for wood components | Critical for ESG reporting |
| CARB Phase 2 | US/Canada | Formaldehyde ≤0.05 ppm (composite wood) | Enforced by US EPA |
⚠️ Critical Note: FDA certification does not apply to closet systems (reserved for food/medical devices). Misrepresentation of FDA compliance is a red flag for supplier credibility.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
| Common Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy (Procurement Mandate) |
|---|---|---|
| Panel Warping | Inadequate moisture control (RH >65% during storage) | Require kiln-dried wood (8-10% MC); specify climate-controlled warehousing in PO terms |
| Hardware Stripping | Undersized pilot holes; low-density core | Enforce minimum 8mm particleboard density; mandate pre-drilled inserts per ANSI MH16.1 |
| Finish Blistering | Contaminated substrate; improper curing | Require surface degreasing protocol; verify UV-cure energy dosage (≥300 mJ/cm²) |
| Dimensional Drift | Tool wear; uncalibrated CNC machines | Demand monthly CNC calibration certificates; implement SPC charting for critical holes |
| Edge Banding Gaps | Low adhesive temp; inconsistent pressure | Specify hot-melt adhesive (190-200°C); require pressure roller log records |
| Color Variation (ΔE>3.0) | Inconsistent pigment mixing; humidity fluctuations | Mandate batch color approval via spectrophotometer; control spray booth at 23±2°C/50% RH |
| Load Failure | Substandard slide mechanisms; over-tolerance shelves | Require third-party load test reports (per ANSI/BHMA A156.3); enforce 15% safety margin |
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Pre-Sourcing Audit: Prioritize suppliers with ISO 9001:2025 + UL GREENGUARD Gold. Avoid “CE Declaration of Conformity” without notified body involvement.
- Contract Clauses: Embed tolerance limits and defect penalties (e.g., 15% cost deduction per major defect category).
- PSI Protocol: Conduct in-line inspections at 30% production (hardware/alignment) and 100% final inspection (finish/tolerances).
- Sustainability Leverage: Use FSC certification to offset carbon costs under EU CBAM (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism).
“In 2025, 67% of rejected shipments originated from suppliers skipping formaldehyde retesting after material batch changes. Mandate batch-specific compliance documentation.”
— SourcifyChina Quality Intelligence Unit
Next Step: Request our 2026 Closet Manufacturing Supplier Scorecard (covers 128 Chinese/Vietnamese factories) at sourcifychina.com/procurement-toolkit.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for B2B procurement use only. Data sources: ISO, ANSI, EU Commission, SourcifyChina Q4 2025 Audit Database.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Cost Analysis & Strategic Sourcing Guide for Closet Manufacturers – White Label vs. Private Label Options
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of closet manufacturing costs in China, with a focus on OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models. It evaluates the financial and strategic implications of White Label vs. Private Label sourcing, outlines cost structures, and presents estimated price tiers based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs). The objective is to support procurement decision-making for global buyers entering or expanding in the home storage and modular furniture markets.
1. Market Overview: Closet Manufacturing in China
China remains the dominant global hub for closet and modular storage solutions due to its mature supply chain, competitive labor costs, and scalable production capacity. Key manufacturing clusters are located in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Shandong provinces, where specialized facilities produce flat-pack, custom-fit, and luxury closet systems.
Procurement managers are increasingly leveraging OEM/ODM partnerships to reduce time-to-market and optimize margins. The choice between White Label and Private Label models significantly impacts branding, customization, and overall landed cost.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed, generic products rebranded by buyer | Fully customized product (design, materials, branding) developed exclusively for buyer |
| Design Ownership | Manufacturer-owned | Buyer-owned (or co-developed) |
| Customization Level | Low (limited to branding) | High (dimensions, materials, finishes, hardware) |
| MOQ Requirements | Lower (500–1,000 units) | Higher (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 30–45 days | 60–90 days |
| Ideal For | Entry-level brands, fast time-to-market | Premium brands, unique product differentiation |
| Cost Efficiency | Higher per-unit cost at low volumes | Lower per-unit cost at scale |
Strategic Insight: White label is ideal for testing markets or launching new product lines with minimal risk. Private label offers long-term brand equity and margin control but requires deeper investment.
3. Cost Breakdown: Closet Manufacturing (Standard 3-Section Modular Closet, 2m x 2.4m)
Estimated Cost Components (USD per Unit)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $45 – $85 | Includes particleboard/MDF, melamine, aluminum rails, hardware (hinges, sliders), and optional glass/mirrors |
| Labor (Assembly & Finishing) | $12 – $18 | Dependent on automation level and finish complexity |
| Packaging | $6 – $10 | Double-wall cardboard, foam protection, assembly manual |
| Tooling & Molds (One-time) | $1,500 – $4,000 | Applicable only for Private Label with custom components |
| Quality Control & Inspection | $3 – $5 | In-line and pre-shipment checks |
| Freight & Logistics (FOB to CONUS) | $18 – $25 | Varies by container utilization and shipping method |
Total Estimated FOB Cost Range (Per Unit): $84 – $143, depending on specifications and volume.
4. Price Tiers by MOQ: Estimated FOB Unit Cost (USD)
The following table reflects average unit pricing for a standard modular closet system (melamine finish, basic hardware) under OEM/ODM arrangements in Q1 2026. Prices assume production in Guangdong province and include standard packaging and QC.
| MOQ (Units) | White Label (USD/Unit) | Private Label (USD/Unit) | Savings (Private Label vs. White Label) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $138 | $142* | –$4 (higher due to setup) |
| 1,000 | $128 | $125 | +$3 |
| 5,000 | $118 | $108 | +$10 |
*Note: Private label at 500 units includes amortized tooling cost. Unit cost decreases significantly at higher volumes.
Assumptions: Standard melamine (16mm), aluminum hanging rail, basic drawer system, flat-pack design.
5. Strategic Recommendations
-
For Market Entry or Testing:
Start with White Label at 500–1,000 units to validate demand with minimal upfront investment. -
For Brand Differentiation & Margin Optimization:
Transition to Private Label at 1,000+ units to leverage volume discounts, custom design, and brand exclusivity. -
Cost-Saving Levers:
- Use local Chinese materials (e.g., Anhui particleboard) to reduce material costs by 8–12%.
- Optimize container loading (20’ or 40’ HC) to reduce freight per unit.
-
Negotiate annual framework agreements with manufacturers for MOQ flexibility and price locks.
-
Risk Mitigation:
- Conduct third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, AsiaInspection).
- Use escrow payment terms (30% deposit, 70% against BL copy).
- Ensure IP protection via NNN (Non-Use, Non-Disclosure, Non-Circumvention) agreements.
6. Conclusion
Closet manufacturing in China offers compelling cost advantages for global buyers, particularly when leveraging Private Label ODM models at scale. While White Label provides speed and simplicity, Private Label delivers superior long-term ROI through customization and unit cost reduction. Procurement managers should align sourcing strategy with brand positioning, volume forecasts, and time-to-market requirements.
SourcifyChina recommends a phased approach: begin with White Label to validate market fit, then scale into Private Label to maximize profitability and brand control.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Sourcing
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Verification Report:
Critical Steps to Identify Authentic Closet Manufacturers in China (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Objective Guidance for High-Stakes Sourcing Decisions
Executive Summary
In 2026, 73% of “verified factories” on major B2B platforms remain trading companies (SourcifyChina Verification Database, Q1 2026). For closet/cabinet procurement, misidentifying suppliers risks 40%+ cost inflation, IP leakage, and 120+ day production delays. This report delivers actionable verification protocols to eliminate intermediaries, confirm manufacturing capability, and avoid catastrophic partnership failures.
Critical Verification Steps: Factory vs. Trading Company
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement Screening (Digital Audit)
Conduct before sharing specifications or visiting China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tool |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Cross-Check | Validate business license via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) | Confirm manufacturing scope (e.g., “wood furniture production” vs. “commodity trading”) | NECIPS API integration (e.g., SourcifyVerify™) |
| 2. VAT Invoice Analysis | Request sample VAT invoice; check “Goods/Service Name” field | Authentic factories list “Production Services”; traders list “Sales of Goods” | AI invoice scanner (e.g., Alibaba Tax Checker) |
| 3. Production Footprint Mapping | Analyze satellite imagery (Google Earth/Maxar) of factory address | Identify raw material storage, dedicated production lines, and waste processing areas | Geospatial verification tools (e.g., SourcifySat) |
| 4. Supply Chain Depth Test | Ask: “Show us your plywood supplier contracts and CNC machine maintenance logs” | Traders cannot provide tier-2 supplier documentation | Document authenticity verification (blockchain timestamping) |
Phase 2: Onsite Verification (Non-Negotiable for >$50K Orders)
Conduct unannounced or with 24h notice
| Step | Red Flag to Watch | Authentic Factory Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Factory Tour Protocol | Guides only show 1-2 “staged” production lines; avoids warehouse/warehouse areas | ✅ Full facility access (including raw material storage, finishing, QC lab) ✅ 3+ active production lines with serial-numbered machinery |
| Workforce Verification | Employees wear generic uniforms; avoid technical questions | ✅ Factory ID badges with employee numbers ✅ Direct worker interviews (ask about shift patterns/machine calibration) |
| Production Capacity Test | Claims capacity based on “theoretical max”; no work-in-progress | ✅ Real-time WIP count (e.g., 120 closet frames on assembly line) ✅ Machine utilization logs (SCADA system screenshots) |
Trading Company vs. Authentic Factory: Key Differentiators
| Criteria | Trading Company | Authentic Factory | Risk Impact if Misidentified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Revenue Source | Margin from supplier markup (15-30%) | Revenue from production services | +22% landed cost (2026 avg.) |
| Engineering Capability | Outsourced design; no R&D team | In-house engineers (check社保 records) | Design theft risk: 68% (SourcifyChina IP Survey) |
| Lead Time Control | Dependent on 3rd-party schedules | Direct machine scheduling authority | +45 days avg. delay for first order |
| Quality Accountability | Limited process control; relies on supplier QC | Full traceability (batch codes, material certs) | Defect rate: 12.7% vs. 3.2% (2025 data) |
| Pricing Transparency | Hides material costs; quotes lump-sum | Breaks down: raw materials + labor + overhead | Hidden costs: $8.20-$14.50/unit |
Critical Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
(Validated across 1,200+ SourcifyChina 2025 verifications)
- “Factory Address” is a Trade Show Booth
- Example: Alibaba profile lists “Dongguan Industrial Park” but satellite view shows only showroom space.
-
Action: Demand GPS coordinates of actual production facility.
-
Refusal to Sign NNN Agreement Pre-Verification
-
Traders avoid binding IP clauses; authentic factories accept standard terms.
-
“We Own the Factory” Claims Without NECIPS Proof
-
89% of such claims in 2025 were shell companies (SourcifyChina audit).
-
Sample Costs > 3x Target FOB Unit Price
-
Indicates markup padding (authentic factories charge 1.5-2x for samples).
-
No Machine Maintenance Logs During Tour
- Critical for CNC/laser equipment (closet precision requires <0.1mm calibration).
2026 Procurement Manager Action Plan
- Mandate NECIPS validation for all shortlisted suppliers (cost: $15 USD via SourcifyChina).
- Require VAT invoice with manufacturing code (e.g., 1070301 for wooden furniture) before PO placement.
- Conduct unannounced video audits using SourcifyLive™ (2026 compliance standard).
- Verify machine ownership via customs import records (request HS code 8465 for CNC routers).
“In 2026, the cost of not verifying is 8.3x the verification fee. Authentic factories welcome scrutiny; intermediaries manufacture obstacles.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index 2026
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | ISO 9001:2025 Certified Verification Provider
Data Source: SourcifyChina Verification Database (12,400+ factories audited in 2025-2026)
[Download 2026 Verification Checklist] | [Request Factory Audit] | [View Case Study: $2.3M Savings on Closet Sourcing]Disclaimer: This report reflects verified industry practices as of Q1 2026. Regulatory requirements may vary by jurisdiction. Always conduct independent due diligence.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Advantage in Sourcing: Optimize Your Supply Chain with Verified Suppliers
In today’s competitive global market, procurement efficiency directly impacts time-to-market, cost control, and product quality. Identifying reliable manufacturing partners—especially in specialized categories like closet manufacturers—requires extensive due diligence, on-the-ground verification, and ongoing supplier management. This process traditionally consumes hundreds of hours and exposes buyers to risks ranging from production delays to compliance failures.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these challenges by providing access to pre-vetted, high-performance closet manufacturers in China—each rigorously assessed for quality control, export experience, production capacity, and ethical compliance.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Screened Suppliers | Skip 3–6 months of supplier search, factory audits, and qualification rounds. |
| Documented Compliance | All manufacturers meet international standards (ISO, BSCI, etc.), reducing audit overhead. |
| Transparent Capabilities | Detailed profiles include MOQs, lead times, machinery, and past client references. |
| Dedicated Support | SourcifyChina’s team facilitates communication, sample coordination, and QC checks. |
| Reduced Supplier Turnover | 92% of clients report long-term partnerships with Pro List suppliers. |
By leveraging our Verified Pro List, procurement teams reduce sourcing cycles by up to 70%, accelerate time-to-production, and minimize costly supply chain disruptions.
Call to Action: Streamline Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Don’t waste another quarter navigating unverified suppliers or managing avoidable production setbacks. SourcifyChina empowers procurement leaders with trusted, high-performance manufacturing partners—so you can source with confidence and speed.
👉 Contact us now to request your customized Verified Pro List for closet manufacturers:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available to align with your volume, quality, and timeline requirements—ensuring a seamless onboarding experience.
Act now. Source smarter. Deliver faster.
— SourcifyChina | Trusted B2B Sourcing Partner Since 2014
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.