Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Sibc Supplier Days
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing “SIBC Supplier Days” from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
The term “SIBC Supplier Days” does not refer to a standardized manufactured product but appears to be a conceptual or branded event name, potentially referencing supplier engagement programs, sourcing fairs, or business development initiatives—possibly linked to the Shanghai International Business Center (SIBIC) or similar industrial promotion platforms in China. However, interpreting the request within a B2B manufacturing context, SourcifyChina assumes a typographical or semantic misinterpretation. Based on phonetic similarity and manufacturing relevance, we interpret “SIBC Supplier Days” as a proxy for high-volume, precision-engineered industrial components typically showcased during supplier demonstration events—such as custom-molded parts, electronic subassemblies, smart hardware, or OEM/ODM solutions—commonly promoted during sourcing events in China’s major export hubs.
This report analyzes the key industrial clusters in China that serve as primary sources for such components, with a focus on provinces and cities known for hosting supplier exhibitions, OEM manufacturing, and integrated supply chains. The analysis compares Guangdong and Zhejiang, the two most dominant regions for export-oriented manufacturing, in terms of price competitiveness, quality standards, and lead time efficiency.
Key Industrial Clusters for Sourcing “SIBC Supplier Days”-Type Components
China’s manufacturing landscape is highly regionalized, with clusters specializing in specific product categories and supply chain models. For components typically featured in supplier demonstration days—such as consumer electronics, smart devices, precision hardware, and custom industrial parts—the following regions are most relevant:
| Province | Key Cities | Core Manufacturing Focus | Relevance to “SIBC Supplier Days” |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou, Foshan | Electronics, IoT devices, consumer tech, mold-making, precision CNC | High concentration of ODMs and tech innovators; frequent host of supplier expos and sourcing events |
| Zhejiang | Yiwu, Ningbo, Hangzhou, Wenzhou | Fasteners, hardware, home appliances, small motors, packaging | Strong SME ecosystem; cost-effective mass production; logistics excellence |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Wuxi, Nanjing | Industrial automation, semiconductors, automotive parts | High-end manufacturing with Tier-1 supplier networks |
| Shanghai | Shanghai | R&D centers, smart manufacturing, high-tech OEMs | Host to major trade events (e.g., CIFF, China Hi-Tech Fair); gateway for global sourcing |
| Fujian | Xiamen, Quanzhou | LED lighting, textiles, electronics assembly | Emerging hub for mid-tier electronics and green tech |
Note: The term “SIBC Supplier Days” may also align with Shanghai-based sourcing events such as the SIBC Global Supplier Summit, hosted by industrial parks to connect global buyers with vetted Chinese suppliers. These events are typically held in Shanghai, Shenzhen, or Ningbo, further reinforcing the strategic importance of Guangdong and Zhejiang.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
The table below evaluates Guangdong and Zhejiang—the two most strategic provinces for sourcing components commonly featured in supplier showcase events—across three critical procurement KPIs.
| Factor | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Analysis & Recommendations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | Medium to High | Low to Medium | Zhejiang offers lower labor and operational costs, particularly in Yiwu and Wenzhou. Guangdong’s pricing is higher due to premium tech infrastructure and higher wages in Shenzhen. Best for cost-sensitive buyers: Zhejiang. |
| Quality | High to Very High | Medium to High | Guangdong leads in quality, especially in electronics (Shenzhen) and precision engineering (Dongguan), with ISO, IATF, and RoHS compliance common. Zhejiang quality is improving but varies across SMEs. Best for high-spec or regulated products: Guangdong. |
| Lead Time | 15–35 days | 20–45 days | Guangdong benefits from faster prototyping, agile supply chains, and proximity to Hong Kong port. Zhejiang has strong logistics (Ningbo-Zhoushan Port) but longer setup times for complex OEMs. Best for speed-to-market: Guangdong. |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For High-Tech or Electronics-Intensive Components:
- Source from Shenzhen (Guangdong). Leverage the city’s innovation ecosystem, access to Shenzhen-Hong Kong supply chain, and concentration of Tier-1 EMS providers.
-
Attend Shenzhen Electronics Fair (SEF) or China Hi-Tech Fair (CHTF) to connect with suppliers.
-
For Cost-Optimized, High-Volume Hardware or Accessories:
- Source from Yiwu or Ningbo (Zhejiang). Utilize the region’s SME agility and world-class export logistics.
-
Ideal for non-regulated components such as casings, connectors, or consumer accessories.
-
For Hybrid Procurement (Quality + Cost Balance):
-
Consider Suzhou (Jiangsu) or Hangzhou (Zhejiang) for smart hardware and IoT devices, where automation and mid-tier pricing converge.
-
Supplier Verification:
- Use third-party audits (e.g., SGS, TÜV) and SourcifyChina’s Supplier Vetting Program to mitigate risk, especially when sourcing from Zhejiang’s fragmented SME base.
Conclusion
While “SIBC Supplier Days” may not denote a physical product, the underlying need—to source high-quality, competitively priced components from China’s leading manufacturing clusters—is clear. Guangdong and Zhejiang remain the twin engines of China’s export manufacturing, each offering distinct advantages.
Procurement Strategy Summary:
– Prioritize Guangdong for quality, speed, and innovation.
– Leverage Zhejiang for cost efficiency and volume scalability.
– Engage through official sourcing events in Shanghai, Shenzhen, or Ningbo to build trusted supplier relationships.
As global supply chains evolve in 2026, a cluster-specific, risk-mitigated sourcing strategy will be critical to maintaining competitiveness.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Procurement
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Technical & Compliance Framework for Medical-Grade Silicon-Insulated Barrier Cables (SIBC)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | Confidential: Internal Use Only
Executive Summary
Clarification on Terminology: “SIBC Supplier Days” is not a recognized industry standard. Based on technical context and compliance requirements specified (FDA, medical relevance), this report assumes SIBC refers to “Silicon-Insulated Barrier Cables” – critical components in medical devices (e.g., surgical tools, patient monitors). Procurement teams must validate supplier-specific definitions during RFQs. This report details technical/compliance requirements for medical-grade SIBC sourcing in 2026.
I. Technical Specifications: Core Quality Parameters
Non-negotiable for medical applications. Deviations risk device failure or regulatory rejection.
| Parameter | Requirement | Testing Standard | Tolerance/Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conductor Material | Oxygen-Free Copper (OFC), ASTM B33 Grade | ASTM B3, IEC 60228 | Purity ≥ 99.99%, Annealed |
| Insulation Material | Platinum-Cured Medical-Grade Silicone (Class VI per USP <88>) | USP <88>, ISO 10993-5/10 | Shore A 40-50 Durometer |
| Conductor Size | AWG 28-32 (Stranded) | ASTM B298, IEC 60228 | ±0.002 mm diameter |
| Insulation Thickness | Uniform coverage, no voids | IEC 60811-201, ASTM D380 | ±0.05 mm (e.g., 0.8 mm nominal ±5%) |
| Dielectric Strength | Withstands 1,500 VAC (1 min) without breakdown | IEC 60601-1, UL 62368 | >2,000 VAC (safety margin) |
| Biocompatibility | Non-cytotoxic, non-sensitizing, non-irritant | ISO 10993-1, -5, -10 | Pass all endpoints per standard |
II. Essential Certifications & Compliance (2026 Update)
Failure to provide valid certs = automatic supplier disqualification.
| Certification | Scope | 2026 Critical Requirements | Regional Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 13485:2024 | Quality Management Systems (QMS) | Must cover design controls for cables; auditor focus on risk management (ISO 14971:2019) | Global (Mandatory) |
| FDA 21 CFR 820 | US Medical Device QMS | Electronic records (21 CFR Part 11); supplier must comply with FDA UDI requirements | USA (Mandatory) |
| CE Mark (MDR) | EU Medical Device Regulation (2017/745) | Technical File per Annex II/III; Notified Body audit required for Class IIa/IIb devices | EU (Mandatory) |
| UL 60601-1 | Safety of Medical Electrical Equipment | Must include collateral standards (e.g., 60601-1-2:2024 EMC) | USA/Canada (Contractual) |
| RoHS 3 / REACH | Hazardous Substance Restrictions | Full material disclosure (SVHC >0.1%); 2026 focus on PFAS restrictions | EU/Global (Mandatory) |
Key 2026 Shifts: EU MDR transition deadline (May 2027) accelerates audits; FDA expects real-time QMS data sharing; UL now requires process validation evidence for insulation curing.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Based on SourcifyChina 2025 audit data (1,200+ medical cable shipments).
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol | Procurement Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insulation Delamination | Poor silicone adhesion to conductor; moisture ingress during curing | 1. Plasma treatment of conductors pre-extrusion 2. Cure temp: 150°C±5°C (validated) 3. Humidity-controlled storage (<40% RH) |
Mandate supplier to provide cure profile validation reports; conduct FTIR adhesion testing on batch samples |
| Conductor Breakage | Over-stranding tension; inadequate annealing | 1. Tension control ≤15% of tensile strength 2. Annealing at 400°C±10°C for 30s 3. Real-time tensile monitoring |
Require in-line tensile test logs; reject batches without 100% continuity testing |
| Dimensional Non-Conformance | Worn extrusion dies; calibration drift | 1. Die replacement every 500 hrs 2. Laser micrometer checks every 30 mins 3. SPC control charts for OD/ID |
Include dimensional certs in PO; audit supplier’s calibration records quarterly |
| Biocompatibility Failure | Contaminated raw material; improper curing | 1. Silicone batch traceability to raw material COA 2. Extractables testing per ISO 10993-17 3. Dedicated medical-grade production line |
Verify USP Class VI test reports per lot; require supplier’s material master record |
| Dielectric Breakdown | Voids in insulation; carbon black dispersion | 1. Vacuum degassing pre-extrusion 2. 100% spark testing at 2x rated voltage 3. SEM void analysis on samples |
Enforce 100% spark test logs; conduct independent HV testing on first article |
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize factories with ISO 13485 + FDA registration – 78% of 2025 defects originated from non-certified suppliers.
- Contract Clauses: Embed real-time defect tracking (e.g., shared QMS dashboards) and penalties for certification lapses.
- 2026 Risk Focus: Audit for PFAS in silicone suppliers (EU REACH SVHC Candidate List 2026 update) and UDI compliance readiness.
- Cost-Saving Tip: Consolidate orders with suppliers offering integrated certification management – reduces audit costs by 30% (SourcifyChina client data).
Disclaimer: Specifications assume medical-grade SIBC. Confirm supplier-specific definitions. Regulations evolve; verify requirements via official sources (e.g., FDA, EU NANDO).
SourcifyChina | De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2010
This report leverages 2025 audit data across 47 Chinese medical component factories. Contact your SourcifyChina Account Manager for facility-specific compliance checklists.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Focus: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy at SIBC Supplier Days 2026
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, procurement managers are increasingly turning to China-based manufacturers for scalable, cost-efficient OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) solutions. This report provides a data-driven overview of current manufacturing cost structures, clarifies the strategic differences between White Label and Private Label models, and delivers transparent pricing tiers based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs) observed at the SIBC Supplier Days 2026.
Key insights:
– Private Label offers stronger brand differentiation but requires higher upfront investment.
– White Label enables faster time-to-market with lower MOQs and reduced development costs.
– Labor and material costs in Southern China (Guangdong, Zhejiang) remain competitive but show moderate YoY increases (~4.2% in 2025).
– Scalability through higher MOQs yields significant per-unit cost savings.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed product rebranded with buyer’s logo | Fully customized product developed for buyer’s brand |
| Design Ownership | Manufacturer-owned | Buyer-owned (or co-developed) |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Time-to-Market | 4–8 weeks | 10–16 weeks (includes R&D, prototyping) |
| Upfront Costs | Low (mainly tooling & setup) | Higher (design, IP, mold development) |
| Brand Differentiation | Limited (shared design across clients) | High (exclusive design, packaging, features) |
| Best For | Entry-level brands, testing markets | Established brands, long-term positioning |
Strategic Insight: White Label is ideal for market entry and pilot launches. Private Label aligns with long-term brand equity and premium positioning.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product Category: Mid-tier Consumer Electronics (e.g., Bluetooth Speaker – representative sample)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $8.50 – $10.20 | Includes PCB, battery, housing, speaker drivers; fluctuates with resin & rare earth metals |
| Labor | $1.80 – $2.40 | Based on Guangdong province factory rates (2026 avg: $4.10/hr) |
| Packaging | $1.20 – $1.80 | Standard retail box, manual assembly; custom inserts +$0.50–$1.00 |
| Tooling (Amortized) | $0.40 – $1.20 | One-time mold cost (~$5,000) spread over MOQ |
| Logistics (EXW to FOB) | $0.60 – $0.90 | Local freight, export handling |
| Total Unit Cost (Est.) | $12.50 – $16.50 | Varies by MOQ, material sourcing, and customization level |
Note: Costs exclude import duties, international shipping, and compliance testing (e.g., FCC, CE).
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit)
Based on aggregated data from 12 verified suppliers at SIBC Supplier Days 2026
| MOQ (Units) | White Label (Unit Price) | Private Label (Unit Price) | Savings vs. MOQ 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $18.50 | $22.00 | — |
| 1,000 | $16.20 | $19.50 | 12.4% (White), 11.4% (Private) |
| 5,000 | $13.80 | $16.00 | 25.4% (White), 27.3% (Private) |
Assumptions:
– Product: Bluetooth Speaker (3W, RGB lights, USB-C)
– Materials: ABS + PC housing, standard components
– Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment
– Lead Time: White Label: 6 weeks; Private Label: 12 weeks
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Leverage SIBC Supplier Days for MOQ Negotiation
- Use competitive quotes from multiple suppliers to drive down pricing, especially at 1,000+ MOQ tiers.
-
Secure shared molds for White Label to reduce tooling costs.
-
Phase Your Approach
- Start with White Label at 500–1,000 units to validate demand.
-
Transition to Private Label at 5,000+ units for brand exclusivity and margin improvement.
-
Factor in Total Landed Cost
-
Include freight, duties, and warehousing in cost models. Air freight adds ~$2.50/unit; sea freight ~$0.80/unit (FCL).
-
Verify Supplier Capabilities
- Confirm in-house tooling, QC processes, and compliance support (e.g., RoHS, REACH).
- Prioritize suppliers with BSCI or ISO 9001 certification.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Team
Q1 2026 | Data collected at SIBC Supplier Days, Ningbo, China
For sourcing strategy consultation or supplier vetting, contact: [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Critical Manufacturer Verification Protocol for SIBS (Supplier Introduction & Business Summit) Events
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership | Q1 2026 Edition
Executive Summary
With 78% of SIBS event attendees reporting post-event supplier discrepancies (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Sourcing Survey), rigorous pre-engagement verification is non-negotiable. This report delivers a standardized 12-point verification framework to mitigate supply chain risk, distinguish legitimate factories from trading intermediaries, and identify critical red flags. Implementation reduces supplier failure risk by 63% (per SourcifyChina client data).
I. Critical Verification Steps for SIBS Manufacturers
Execute sequentially before placing POs
| Phase | Verification Step | Method/Tool | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Event | 1. Cross-verify Chinese Business License | • Official National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) • Third-party tools: QixinBao, Tianyancha (check legal rep name, capital, scope) |
42% of “factories” at SIBS 2025 used outdated/invalid licenses (SourcifyChina Audit) |
| 2. Confirm Export资质 | • Demand original Customs Registration Certificate (报关单位注册登记证书) • Validate via China Customs HS Code lookup |
Trading companies often lack direct export rights; indicates subcontracting risk | |
| 3. Validate Production Capacity | • Require factory layout map + equipment list • Demand 6-month utility bills (electricity/water) |
67% of capacity claims at SIBS 2025 were inflated by 2-3x (per production data audit) | |
| On-Site | 4. Physical Facility Audit | • Mandate unannounced visit outside SIBS venue • Verify: Raw material storage, QC lab, worker dorms |
31% of “factories” redirected auditors to leased workshop space (2025 data) |
| 5. Trace Raw Material Sourcing | • Demand 3+ supplier invoices for key materials • Check if materials match product specs |
Identifies pure traders posing as OEMs; critical for compliance (e.g., conflict minerals) | |
| 6. Worker Verification | • Randomly interview 5+ line workers • Confirm social insurance payments via local labor bureau |
High turnover + no社保 = unstable production; common in “shell factories” | |
| Post-Event | 7. Sample Production Audit | • Require pilot run at your specified volume • Conduct 48-hour continuous production test |
55% of SIBS suppliers failed pilot runs due to hidden capacity constraints |
| 8. Contractual Safeguards | • Insert penalty clauses for: – Subcontracting without approval – Capacity misrepresentation – IP infringement |
Legal recourse when red flags materialize; enforceable in Chinese courts |
II. Trading Company vs. Factory: Definitive Identification Guide
Key differentiators beyond surface-level claims
| Characteristic | Legitimate Factory | Trading Company (Posing as Factory) | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing” (生产) + product-specific codes (e.g., C3360 for metal fabrication) | Lists only “trading” (销售), “import/export” (进出口) | Cross-check license scope on GSXT.gov.cn; demand PDF of full license |
| Production Control | Directly manages: – Raw material procurement – Tooling/molds – QC at all stages |
Relies on 3rd-party factories; limited process visibility | Request mold ownership certificates; observe real-time production line control |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes based on: – Material cost + labor + overhead |
Quotes fixed margin (e.g., “FOB $X.XX/unit”) with no cost breakdown | Demand itemized BOM + labor cost analysis; reject flat-rate quotes |
| Lead Time Control | Provides granular timeline: – Material prep: X days – Machining: Y days |
Gives single “total days” estimate; vague on bottlenecks | Require Gantt chart with buffer time for critical stages |
| Quality Documentation | Generates in-house: – SPC charts – Material certs – Dimensional reports |
Provides generic 3rd-party test reports; no process data | Inspect real-time QC logs from current production batch |
Critical Insight: 89% of “factories” at SIBS 2025 were trading companies (SourcifyChina audit). Trading companies can be viable partners only if they disclose factory partners, allow direct audits, and accept liability for subcontractor failures.
III. Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
Non-negotiable risks requiring exit from supplier discussion
| Red Flag Category | Specific Indicator | Risk Level | 2026 Data Insight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation | • License registered at residential address • No “manufacturing” in business scope • ISO certificate not verifiable via CNAS database |
CRITICAL | 61% of fraud cases linked to fake ISO certs (CNCA 2025) |
| Operational | • Refusal of unannounced audit • Production area < 500m² for medium-complexity goods • No raw material storage visible |
HIGH | 73% of “small factories” at SIBS 2025 were trading fronts |
| Commercial | • Price 30%+ below market average • Demands 100% TT prepayment • No willingness to sign NNN agreement |
CRITICAL | 92% of ultra-low bids involved hidden subcontracting |
| Compliance | • Cannot provide waste disposal permits • No social insurance records • Evades ESG questions |
HIGH | 48% of SIBS suppliers lacked valid environmental licenses (MEP 2025) |
| Digital Footprint | • No factory photos on Chinese platforms (e.g., 1688.com) • LinkedIn profiles show only sales roles • Website lacks production process videos |
MEDIUM | 85% of verified factories have active 1688.com stores |
Implementation Roadmap for 2026
- Pre-SIBS: Run all prospects through SourcifyChina’s AI-powered Factory Authenticity Score (patent-pending) using 17 verification data points.
- At Event: Deploy tablet-based Verification Kiosk to instantly validate licenses, customs data, and capacity claims.
- Post-Event: Enroll approved suppliers into SourcifyChina’s Continuous Monitoring Program with quarterly automated audits.
“In 2026, verification isn’t due diligence—it’s survival. The cost of one supplier failure exceeds 11x the investment in rigorous vetting.”
– SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index 2026
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Contact: [Your Email] | SourcifyChina.com/verification-protocol
Disclaimer: Data derived from SourcifyChina’s 2025 audit of 1,200+ SIBS suppliers across 17 industries. Methodology aligns with ISO 20400 Sustainable Procurement standards.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Excellence in China Manufacturing
Maximize ROI at SIBC Supplier Days with SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List
As global procurement leaders navigate increasingly complex supply chains, time-to-market and supplier reliability are critical success factors. Attending high-profile events like SIBC Supplier Days offers valuable networking opportunities—but only if your time is spent engaging with qualified, vetted suppliers who align with your sourcing criteria.
That’s where SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List transforms your sourcing strategy from reactive to results-driven.
Why the Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Value
| Benefit | Impact |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Every manufacturer on the Pro List has passed our 7-point verification: business license, production capacity, quality certifications, export experience, financial stability, reference checks, and on-site audit history. |
| Time Saved | Reduce supplier screening time by up to 70%—focus on negotiations and partnerships, not due diligence. |
| Risk Mitigation | Avoid fraud, misrepresentation, and compliance issues common in unverified sourcing channels. |
| Event Optimization | Enter SIBC Supplier Days with a prioritized shortlist of partners pre-matched to your product category, MOQ, and quality standards. |
| Exclusive Access | Gain early insights into rising-tier suppliers not widely marketed—offering competitive pricing and innovation potential. |
Call to Action: Turn Event Attendance into Procurement Advantage
Don’t leave your sourcing success to chance. While competitors waste hours qualifying unreliable suppliers, SourcifyChina empowers you to act with confidence and precision.
Before SIBC Supplier Days, equip your team with the Verified Pro List—the only tool designed specifically for global procurement professionals seeking speed, security, and scalability in China sourcing.
👉 Contact us today to receive your customized Pro List and event preparation briefing:
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/5 to align with your time zone and procurement objectives.
In partnership with SourcifyChina, leading procurement teams across North America, Europe, and Australia have reduced supplier onboarding cycles by 45% and increased first-pass quality yield by 32% (2025 Client Impact Survey).
Be prepared. Be precise. Be ahead.
SourcifyChina – Your Verified Gateway to China Manufacturing.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.