Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Water Purifier Supplier

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Water Purifier Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Confidentiality: Client-Exclusive
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for water purifier manufacturing, supplying ~78% of the world’s residential/commercial units (2025 GWI Data). This report identifies key industrial clusters, analyzes regional strengths/weaknesses, and provides actionable insights for optimizing sourcing strategies. While Guangdong leads in high-end smart systems and export readiness, Zhejiang excels in cost efficiency for mid-tier models. Strategic selection requires balancing price sensitivity, technical complexity, and compliance needs. Emerging clusters (Anhui, Sichuan) show promise for labor-intensive assembly but lack ecosystem maturity.
Key Industrial Clusters for Water Purifier Manufacturing
China’s water purifier production is concentrated in 3 primary clusters, each with distinct specializations:
| Province/City | Core Production Hubs | Specialization Focus | Key OEM/ODM Strengths | Export Volume Share (2025) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shunde (Foshan), Zhongshan, Shenzhen | Smart/IoT purifiers, RO systems, medical-grade filtration | Full R&D integration, NSF/CE/WQA-certified lines, automation expertise | 52% |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Hangzhou, Yuyao | Gravity-fed filters, UV systems, faucet-mounted units | Cost-optimized components, rapid prototyping, large-scale assembly | 31% |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Wuxi | Commercial/industrial systems, UF membrane production | High-precision engineering, custom B2B solutions | 12% |
| Emerging | Hefei (Anhui), Chengdu (Sichuan) | Basic pitcher/ceramic filters, sub-assembly | Low labor costs, new industrial parks (limited certifications) | 5% |
Cluster Dynamics Note: Guangdong dominates Tier-1 supplier networks (80% of global top 10 brands source here), while Zhejiang serves value-focused retailers (e.g., Amazon, Costco private labels). Jiangsu is critical for heavy commercial projects (>500 LPH capacity).
Regional Comparison: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang (2026 Sourcing Metrics)
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina audit data of 127 active suppliers (MOQ: 1,000 units)
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/unit) | $48–$120 (RO Smart Purifier, 500 GPD) | $32–$75 (RO Purifier, 500 GPD) | Guangdong: +25–40% premium for IoT/NSF-58 certifications. Zhejiang: Best for budget segments (<$50). |
| Quality Tier | Premium: Consistent NSF/CE/WQA compliance; <0.8% field failure rate (2025 data) | Mid-Tier: Variable certification adherence; 1.5–2.2% failure rate (non-compliant resin seals common) | Guangdong: Mandatory for regulated markets (EU/US). Zhejiang: Requires strict 3rd-party QC for compliance. |
| Lead Time | 45–60 days (Standard) 65–80 days (Custom IoT) |
35–50 days (Standard) 55–70 days (Custom) |
Guangdong: Longer mold/tooling cycles (+10–15 days). Zhejiang: Faster turnaround for non-complex units. |
| Supply Chain Depth | Full vertical integration (membranes, pumps, PCBs in-region) | Relies on external component sourcing (e.g., pumps from Jiangsu) | Guangdong: Lower supply disruption risk. Zhejiang: Vulnerable to part shortages. |
| MOQ Flexibility | 1,000–5,000 units (Smart models) | 500–1,000 units (Basic models) | Zhejiang: Better for test orders/low-volume buyers. |
Critical Sourcing Recommendations for 2026
- Prioritize Guangdong for:
- Smart/IoT-enabled purifiers targeting North America/EU.
- Projects requiring NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 58, or WQA Gold Seal certifications.
-
Risk Mitigation Tip: Audit supplier labs for in-house testing capability (avoid “certification resellers”).
-
Opt for Zhejiang when:
- Sourcing basic RO/UV units for emerging markets (LATAM, Africa).
- Budget constraints override premium compliance needs.
-
Risk Mitigation Tip: Mandate 100% pre-shipment inspection with SGS/BV for critical components (resin tanks, membranes).
-
Avoid Emerging Clusters for:
- Direct consumer sales (regulatory gaps in Anhui/Sichuan).
-
Complex systems requiring multi-component integration.
-
2026 Cost Pressure Alert:
Rising labor costs in Guangdong (+7.2% YoY) are narrowing the price gap with Zhejiang for mid-tier units. However, Guangdong’s compliance premium remains justified for regulated markets – non-compliance fines exceed 15% of FOB value in the EU (2025 Enforcement Data).
Next Steps for Procurement Managers
- Shortlist Validation: Request facility videos showing real-time production (not stock footage) and batch-specific certification logs.
- Compliance Checklist: Verify supplier holds active NSF/WQA certificates (not expired/test reports).
- Lead Time Hack: Place orders 90 days pre-peak season (Q3) to avoid port congestion (Shenzhen/Ningbo).
“In 2026, water purifier sourcing isn’t about finding the cheapest supplier – it’s about de-risking compliance. Guangdong’s ecosystem maturity justifies its cost for global brands.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Team
Data Sources: China Household Electric Appliance Association (CHEAA), Global Water Intelligence (GWI), SourcifyChina Supplier Audit Database (Q4 2025). All pricing reflects FOB Shenzhen/Ningbo, 2026 Q1 forecasts.
SourcifyChina | De-risking China Sourcing Since 2010 | www.sourcifychina.com
This report is confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient. Unauthorized distribution is prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Water Purifier Suppliers in China
1. Introduction
This report outlines the essential technical specifications, compliance standards, and quality control measures required when sourcing water purifiers from suppliers in China. As global demand for safe drinking water rises, procurement managers must ensure that sourced products meet international quality benchmarks and regulatory requirements.
This document serves as a strategic guide for evaluating supplier capabilities, mitigating risks, and ensuring product reliability across diverse markets.
2. Key Technical Specifications
2.1 Materials Requirements
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Housing (Filter Casing) | Food-grade polypropylene (PP), ABS, or stainless steel (SS304/SS316) | Must be non-toxic, UV-resistant, and pressure-rated (≥80 psi) |
| Membranes (RO, UF, NF) | Thin-film composite (TFC), polysulfone (PS), or polyethersulfone (PES) | RO membranes must reject ≥95% of TDS; UF pore size ≤0.01 µm |
| O-Rings & Seals | FDA-compliant silicone or EPDM rubber | Must resist chlorine, ozone, and temperature fluctuations |
| Pipes & Tubing | FDA-approved polyethylene (PE) or PE-RT | Must be BPA-free and withstand operating pressures |
| Faucets & Fittings | Lead-free brass (<0.25% lead content) or 304/316 stainless steel | Compliant with NSF/ANSI 61 and AB1953 |
2.2 Dimensional Tolerances
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Criticality |
|---|---|---|
| Filter Housing Diameter | ±0.2 mm | Ensures proper cartridge fit |
| Thread Pitch (NPT, BSP) | ±5% | Prevents leaks and ensures compatibility |
| Membrane Housing Length | ±0.5 mm | Affects sealing and pressure integrity |
| Inlet/Outlet Port Alignment | ±0.3° angular deviation | Avoids stress on plumbing connections |
| Flow Restrictor Diameter | ±0.05 mm | Critical for RO system performance |
3. Essential Certifications & Compliance Standards
| Certification | Governing Body | Scope & Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | European Commission | Mandatory for sale in EU; covers safety, EMC, RoHS |
| NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 58, 401 | NSF International | Validates contaminant reduction (chlorine, lead, cysts, TDS, emerging contaminants) |
| FDA 21 CFR | U.S. Food & Drug Administration | Ensures materials are food-contact safe; critical for export to USA |
| UL 1081 | Underwriters Laboratories | Safety standard for household water purification systems |
| ISO 9001:2015 | International Organization for Standardization | Quality management system; indicates supplier process control |
| RoHS & REACH | EU Directives | Restricts hazardous substances; required for EU market access |
| WaterSense (EPA) | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency | For water-efficient models (where applicable) |
Note: Suppliers must provide valid, traceable certification documents. Third-party audit reports (e.g., SGS, TÜV) are recommended for verification.
4. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Leakage at Housing Joints | Poor O-ring fit, incorrect thread sealing, or housing warpage | Use precision-molded housings; verify O-ring dimensions; conduct pressure testing (1.5x rated pressure for 5 min) |
| Low Filtration Efficiency | Substandard or counterfeit membranes; incorrect membrane installation | Source membranes from certified suppliers; perform batch testing for TDS rejection; train assembly staff |
| Discoloration or Odor in Output Water | Use of non-FDA-compliant plastics or residual molding agents | Enforce material traceability; conduct water taste/odor tests post-production |
| Premature Cartridge Clogging | Poor pre-filter design or low-quality sediment filters | Implement multi-stage pre-filtration; validate pore size consistency via lab testing |
| Electronic Control Failures (in Smart Purifiers) | Inadequate waterproofing; low-grade PCBs | Use conformal-coated PCBs; conduct IP67 ingress testing; perform 72-hour burn-in tests |
| Non-Compliant Material Content (e.g., Lead, BPA) | Use of recycled or uncertified raw materials | Require material test reports (MTRs); conduct random ICP-MS testing for heavy metals |
| Inconsistent Flow Rate | Incorrect flow restrictor size or pump calibration | Calibrate pumps and restrictors during assembly; test flow rate per unit (L/min) |
| Packaging Damage During Transit | Inadequate shock absorption or stacking strength | Use ECT-rated corrugated boxes; include corner boards; conduct drop tests (1.2m, 3 drops) |
5. Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Conduct On-Site Audits: Visit supplier facilities to assess production lines, QC labs, and raw material storage.
- Require First Article Inspection (FAI): Approve initial production samples before full-scale manufacturing.
- Implement AQL Sampling (Level II): Use ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 for batch inspections (Critical: 0%, Major: 2.5%, Minor: 4.0%).
- Secure Long-Term Material Agreements: Ensure consistency by locking in material grades and suppliers.
- Leverage Third-Party Testing: Partner with labs like SGS, Intertek, or TÜV for pre-shipment verification.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
Confidential – For Client Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Water Purifier Manufacturing Economics (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Executives | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
The global water purifier market (valued at $38.2B in 2025) faces intensified cost pressures from volatile polymer prices (+12% YoY) and stricter EU/US regulatory compliance. This report provides actionable cost benchmarks for sourcing water purifiers from China via OEM/ODM channels, with critical differentiation between White Label (WL) and Private Label (PL) models. Key insight: PL requires 15-25% higher initial investment but delivers 30-45% greater long-term margin control versus WL.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Critical for brand positioning and cost optimization
| Criteria | White Label (WL) | Private Label (PL) | Procurement Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-engineered units with only logo/label swap | Full customization (housing, UI, filtration stages) | WL: Faster time-to-market (8-10 weeks). PL: Requires 16-20 weeks for tooling. |
| MOQ Flexibility | 300-500 units (standard models) | 1,000+ units (custom molds) | WL ideal for market testing; PL requires volume commitment. |
| Tooling Costs | $0 (uses supplier’s existing molds) | $8,000-$25,000 (new molds/electronics) | PL tooling amortized over MOQ; critical for unit cost math. |
| Compliance Burden | Supplier-managed (basic CE/FCC) | Buyer-managed (full regional certification) | WL reduces compliance risk; PL demands internal QA resources. |
| Margin Control | Limited (fixed BOM costs) | High (direct BOM negotiation) | PL buyers achieve 35-50% gross margins vs. WL’s 20-30%. |
| Best For | Startups, DTC flash sales, emergency inventory | Established brands, subscription models, premium tiers | Recommendation: Use WL for pilot runs; transition to PL at 5K+ units. |
Estimated Unit Cost Breakdown (RO-Based 6-Stage Purifier, 500L/day Capacity)
All costs FOB Shenzhen; excludes shipping, tariffs, and compliance fees
| Cost Component | White Label (Base) | Private Label (Custom) | Key Variables |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $48.50 | $42.00 – $58.00 | Filter membrane grade (TFC vs. CTA), housing polymer (ABS vs. food-grade PP), smart sensor inclusion (+$7.50). |
| Labor | $8.20 | $6.50 – $10.00 | Automation level (manual assembly = +$2.30/unit); testing rigor (3-stage QC adds $1.80). |
| Packaging | $3.80 | $4.20 – $6.50 | Retail-ready boxes (+$1.20), multilingual manuals, anti-theft tags. |
| Total Unit Cost | $60.50 | $52.70 – $74.50 | PL cost variance driven by customization depth |
Note: PL material costs can undercut WL by 12-15% at scale due to direct BOM negotiation. However, low-volume PL (MOQ 500) often exceeds WL costs by 8-10%.
MOQ-Based Price Tier Analysis (FOB Unit Price)
Based on 2026 SourcifyChina Factory Audit Data (50+ Suppliers)
| MOQ Tier | White Label Price Range | Private Label Price Range | Key Cost Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $89.00 – $112.00 | $95.00 – $128.00 | High tooling amortization (PL); WL uses existing stock. Rush fees apply to both. |
| 1,000 units | $78.50 – $96.00 | $76.00 – $92.50 | PL tooling fully amortized; WL bulk discounts minimal. Labor efficiency improves. |
| 5,000 units | $67.00 – $81.00 | $62.50 – $74.00 | PL achieves 7-12% cost advantage via BOM optimization. Volume discounts on membranes/housings. |
Critical Footnotes:
1. PL at 5K+ MOQ assumes standardized filtration tech (RO/UV). Advanced features (IoT, 10-stage) add $12-$22/unit.
2. Prices exclude 5-8% compliance costs (NSF/ANSI 58, EU 10/2011). Budget $3.50-$6.00/unit for certification.
3. 2026 volatility factor: Polymer prices fluctuate ±9% quarterly. Lock BOM pricing via 6-month contracts.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid WL for Core Products: While WL reduces initial risk, it commoditizes your offering. Use only for short-term channel testing.
- PL Minimum Viable Volume: Commit to PL only at 1,000+ units. Below this, WL’s lower entry cost outweighs PL’s margin benefits.
- Tooling Cost Negotiation: Demand split tooling ownership (e.g., buyer funds 70%, supplier 30% with buy-back clause).
- Compliance Budgeting: Allocate 7% of COGS for certifications – non-negotiable in EU/US markets post-2025 regulatory shifts.
- Labor Arbitrage: Target suppliers in Anhui/Jiangxi provinces (15-18% lower labor vs. Guangdong) for >3K MOQs.
“The 2026 differentiator isn’t if you source from China, but how strategically you leverage PL economics. Winners will treat suppliers as R&D partners, not just factories.”
— SourcifyChina Manufacturing Intelligence Unit
Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Water Purifier Sourcing Index (Audited 52 Tier 1-2 Chinese manufacturers; Q4 2025). Data reflects FOB Shenzhen pricing. Valid through Q2 2026.
Next Steps: Request our Water Purifier Supplier Scorecard (150+ pre-vetted factories) at sourcifychina.com/water-2026.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Not for redistribution.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Water Purifier Supplier in China
Issued by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
Sourcing water purifiers from China offers cost-efficiency and scalability, but risks related to misrepresentation, quality inconsistency, and supply chain opacity remain prevalent. This report outlines a structured due diligence framework to verify manufacturers, differentiate between trading companies and actual factories, and identify critical red flags. Adherence to these steps mitigates procurement risk and ensures long-term supplier reliability.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Water Purifier Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Scope of Operations | Confirm legal registration and manufacturing authorization | Validate via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site Factory Audit | Physically verify production capabilities and quality systems | Hire third-party inspection firm (e.g., SGS, TÜV, or SourcifyChina Audit Team) |
| 3 | Review Production Equipment & Capacity | Assess ability to meet volume and technical requirements | Request equipment list, production line photos/videos, and capacity reports |
| 4 | Evaluate Quality Control Processes | Ensure consistent product quality | Audit QC protocols, certifications (ISO 9001, ISO 14001), and testing procedures |
| 5 | Request Sample Testing & Certification | Validate compliance with international standards | Test samples at accredited labs for NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 401, or WQA certification |
| 6 | Verify Export Experience & Client References | Confirm reliability in international shipping and customer service | Request 3+ export references and track record with Western buyers |
| 7 | Assess R&D and Engineering Support | Ensure ability to customize and innovate | Review engineering team credentials and past OEM/ODM projects |
Best Practice: Use a Supplier Scorecard evaluating technical capability (30%), quality systems (25%), compliance (20%), capacity (15%), and financial stability (10%).
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or “fabrication” | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” only |
| Facility Ownership | Owns or leases manufacturing plant; production lines visible | No production lines; office-only setup |
| Pricing Structure | Lower MOQs, direct cost transparency (material + labor) | Higher pricing with limited cost breakdown |
| Lead Times | Shorter, direct control over production scheduling | Longer, dependent on third-party factories |
| Customization Capability | Full control over mold development, design, and engineering | Limited to options offered by partner factories |
| Communication Access | Direct contact with production/quality managers | Communication filtered through sales agents |
| Factory Audit Results | Equipment, raw material storage, and assembly lines on-site | No machinery; samples sourced externally |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can I speak with your production manager?” Factories will connect you immediately; traders often delay or refuse.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Selecting a Water Purifier Supplier
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials, labor exploitation, or hidden costs | Benchmark against market rates; request itemized BOM |
| No Physical Address or Virtual Office | High risk of fraud or shell company | Require GPS-tagged photos and in-person audit |
| Refusal to Allow Factory Audits | Conceals poor working conditions, capacity issues, or subcontracting | Make audit a contractual prerequisite |
| Lack of Product Certifications | Non-compliance with safety/environmental standards (e.g., NSF, CE, RoHS) | Require valid, up-to-date certification copies |
| Inconsistent Communication or Delays | Indicates disorganization or lack of internal coordination | Monitor responsiveness over 2–3 weeks |
| No Mold or Tooling Ownership | Limits IP control and long-term supply security | Ensure molds are client-owned and stored under contract |
| Overly Aggressive Sales Tactics | May prioritize closing over transparency | Engage only suppliers with technical, data-driven responses |
4. Recommended Due Diligence Checklist
✅ Verified business license (NECIPS)
✅ On-site audit completed with report
✅ ISO 9001 and relevant water filtration certifications
✅ 3+ client references (preferably in EU/US)
✅ Ownership of molds/tooling confirmed in contract
✅ Sample passed third-party lab testing
✅ Clear MOQ, payment terms, and lead time agreement
Conclusion
Selecting a reliable water purifier supplier in China demands structured verification beyond digital profiles. Prioritize transparency, traceability, and technical competence. Factories with proven engineering expertise and compliance history offer sustainable advantages over trading intermediaries. Implementing this framework reduces supply chain risk, ensures regulatory compliance, and supports scalable, high-quality procurement.
For tailored supplier shortlisting and audit coordination, contact the SourcifyChina Sourcing Team.
SourcifyChina
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified Chinese Manufacturing
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List

Strategic Sourcing Imperative: Optimizing Water Purifier Procurement in 2026
A SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Report for Global Procurement Leaders
The Critical Challenge: Water Purifier Sourcing in 2026
Global procurement managers face unprecedented pressure to secure certified, scalable, and compliant water purifier suppliers amid tightening global regulations (e.g., NSF/ANSI 58, EU WFD), volatile raw material costs, and rising quality fraud incidents. Traditional supplier vetting consumes 72+ hours per qualified lead, with 43% of unverified suppliers failing post-audit compliance checks (2025 Global Sourcing Benchmark).
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Risk & Saves Time
| Procurement Stage | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time Saved per Project |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Identification | 15–20 hrs scouring Alibaba, trade shows, referrals | Instant access to 37 pre-vetted Tier-1 suppliers | 18.5 hrs |
| Compliance Validation | 30+ hrs verifying ISO 9001, NSF, CE, BSCI certificates | All suppliers audited for 2026 regulatory requirements | 32 hrs |
| Quality Assurance | On-site factory audits ($1,200–$2,500) | 12-month QC performance data + 3rd-party lab reports | 21.5 hrs |
| Lead Time Verification | 10–15 hrs negotiating MOQs/capacity | Confirmed production capacity & 95%+ on-time delivery rate | 13 hrs |
| TOTAL SAVED | 85+ hours |
✅ Key Advantages Embedded in Every Pro List Entry:
– Zero Fraud Guarantee: 100% factory-verified ownership (no trading companies)
– Regulatory Shield: Real-time updates on EPA, EU, and emerging market compliance
– Cost Transparency: FOB pricing benchmarks with material cost breakdowns
– Scalability Proof: Documented capacity for orders 1K–50K units/month
Your Strategic Procurement Advantage Starts Now
In 2026, sourcing isn’t just about cost—it’s about de-risking your supply chain while accelerating time-to-market. With water purifier demand surging 12.3% YoY (Statista 2026), delays in supplier qualification directly impact revenue.
The SourcifyChina Pro List isn’t a directory—it’s your force multiplier.
Skip 85+ hours of manual vetting. Eliminate compliance surprises. Secure suppliers who deliver on certification promises.
✨ Call to Action: Secure Your Verified Water Purifier Supplier List Today
Stop gambling with unverified suppliers. In the next 72 hours, 23 procurement teams will use our Pro List to lock in Q3 2026 capacity at 2025 benchmark pricing. Your competitive edge is one click away:
-
📧 Email: Contact
[email protected]with subject line: “PRO LIST: Water Purifier – [Your Company Name]”
→ Receive your free, customized supplier shortlist within 4 business hours. -
📱 WhatsApp: Message
+86 159 5127 6160for urgent capacity checks or compliance queries.
→ Our Mandarin/English-speaking team responds in <15 minutes (24/7).
Why act now? Verified suppliers on our Pro List have 37% faster order fulfillment vs. industry average (Q1 2026 data). The next 5 clients this week receive complimentary shipment QC inspection.
SourcifyChina: Precision Sourcing, Guaranteed Outcomes
Trusted by Fortune 500 procurement teams across 32 countries since 2018
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All supplier data refreshed quarterly per ISO 20400:2017 standards.
Data sources: SourcifyChina 2026 Supplier Performance Index, Statista Water Treatment Report, Global Sourcing Institute Audit Database
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
